2015
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal identification of damaged frames

Abstract: Summary The paper investigates the possibility of identifying localised damages for multi‐span and multi‐floor linear elastic frames using only natural frequencies measured in the undamaged and damaged configurations. Namely, frames of increasing complexity are studied by exploring one by one their significant substructures (i.e. multi‐span beams, floor by floor); the error function is defined and minimised on a database of finite element damaged models that only includes the natural frequencies of the local m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in other papers of the writers', such procedure can also be extended to multispan and multi-floor framed structures, where only higher-order modes are significantly affected by local damage, by means of a substructure approach (Bellizzotti 2009;Diaferio and Sepe 2016). In , the possibility of applying such a procedure when the damaged span of a multispan beam is not directly accessible is also discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in other papers of the writers', such procedure can also be extended to multispan and multi-floor framed structures, where only higher-order modes are significantly affected by local damage, by means of a substructure approach (Bellizzotti 2009;Diaferio and Sepe 2016). In , the possibility of applying such a procedure when the damaged span of a multispan beam is not directly accessible is also discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further insights for the direct problem are in Figures 9 and 10, which show exact solutions (ESs) versus the firstand second-order solutions provided by the PA, both for the eigenvalues (i.e., the imaginary and real parts of eigenvalues of the dynamic problem) and the four components (with real and imaginary parts) of the fastest natural mode (i.e., the fourth mode shape of the dynamic problem) before Liu's rotation. The ESs are so defined since they are the eigensolutions of the complete problem expressed by Equation 9, while the first-and second-order solutions are provided by Equation (21). The curves providing the so-called ESs are solid, the others are dashed.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Eigensolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural health monitoring is suitable in many engineering fields: we may quote Loh et al 18 for vibration-based damage detection in such industrial apparatus as wind turbines; Rainieri and Fabbrocino 19 for monitoring of civil structures and infrastructures in earthquake-prone areas; Oregui et al 20 for monitoring welded bolts by acceleration measurements; Diaferio and Sepe 21 and Antonacci et al 22 on vibration measurements for damage detection in framed structures; and a very recent insight onto possible medical applications is in Ong et al 23 Undamaged civil, industrial or aerospace framed structures can be described as proportionally damped systems, see the well-known monographs: 24,25 the physical quantity describing dissipation (damping) is supposed to be linearly related to the inertial and elastic properties. Then, the structure has real natural mode shapes in linear dynamics and, if it is naturally discrete, or made discrete by suitable assumptions, the mode shapes are lists of real quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identification of structural dynamic properties at seismic input pursues various goals, as response prediction, condition assessment, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, or damage identification. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Nearly all of the available attempts towards these ends pertain to the realm of Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA), [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] since they need the knowledge or measurement of the input ground motion. However, in most practical cases, the true foundation input motion turns out to be unavailable or unreliable (e.g., not recorded, recorded with low signal-to-noise ratio, or affected by soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects [19] ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%