2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.15390
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Fracture of Higher Groups

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the modal aspects of higher groups in Shulman's Cohesive Homotopy Type Theory. We show that every higher group sits within a modal fracture hexagon which renders it into its discrete, infinitesimal, and contractible components. This gives an unstable and synthetic construction of Schreiber's differential cohomology hexagon. As an example of this modal fracture hexagon, we recover the character diagram characterizing ordinary differential cohomology by its relation to its underlying in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to allowing us to formalize the theorem about Čech nerves of open covers as Theorem 6.1.5, our type theory will be able to handle the equivariant differential cohesion used by Sati and Schreiber in their Proper orbifold cohomology [43], as well as the nested focuses of Schreiber's supergeometric solid cohesion [44]. This extends the work of Cherubini [17] and the first author [34,35,36] of giving synthetic accounts of the constructions of Schreiber [44] and Sati-Schreiber [43].…”
Section: Mengen Kardinalen Points Codiscrete Discretementioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition to allowing us to formalize the theorem about Čech nerves of open covers as Theorem 6.1.5, our type theory will be able to handle the equivariant differential cohesion used by Sati and Schreiber in their Proper orbifold cohomology [43], as well as the nested focuses of Schreiber's supergeometric solid cohesion [44]. This extends the work of Cherubini [17] and the first author [34,35,36] of giving synthetic accounts of the constructions of Schreiber [44] and Sati-Schreiber [43].…”
Section: Mengen Kardinalen Points Codiscrete Discretementioning
confidence: 89%