2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOCSS: Multi-omics data clustering and cancer subtyping via shared and specific representation learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have observed, however, that many of the best projections are associated with nearly orthogonal bases. This indicates that the encoder-decoder dimensionality reduction strategy can be successfully coupled with an orthogonality constraint 42 , 43 in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have observed, however, that many of the best projections are associated with nearly orthogonal bases. This indicates that the encoder-decoder dimensionality reduction strategy can be successfully coupled with an orthogonality constraint 42 , 43 in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These include the early integration method LRAcluster [ 13 ], the late integration method PINSPlus [ 16 ] and 12 intermediate integration methods. The intermediate integration methods include six traditional methods and six latest deep learning integration methods: SNF [ 21 ], rMKL-LPP [ 17 ], MCCA [ 14 ], MultiNMF [ 15 ], iClusterBayes [ 12 ], NEMO [ 22 ], DCAP [ 29 ], DLSF [ 30 ], DSIR [ 31 ], MRGCN [ 32 ], MOCSS [ 37 ] and DMCL [ 38 ]. Among them, DCAP, DLSF, MOCSS and DMCL are deep learning integration methods designed to solve the noise in heterogeneous omics data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess Subtype-MGTP’s performance in cancer subtype identification, we conducted extensive experiments on the benchmark datasets, comparing it against nine state-of-the-art methods: K-means ( Ding and He 2004 ), LRAcluster ( Wu et al 2015 ), PINS ( Nguyen et al 2017 ), MCCA ( Witten and Tibshirani 2009 ), NEMO ( Rappoport and Shamir 2019 ), Subtype-GAN ( Yang et al 2021 ), Subtype-DCC ( Zhao et al 2023 ), DMCL ( Chen et al 2023a ), and MOCSS ( Chen et al 2023b ). To ensure a fair comparison among all methods, a consistent number of clusters was set for each dataset, adhering to established research guidelines ( Yang et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, two novel end-to-end multi-omics cancer subtyping models Subtype-DCC ( Zhao et al 2023 ) and DMCL ( Chen et al 2023a ) optimize representation learning and clustering jointly. MOCSS ( Chen et al 2023b ) integrated improved contrastive learning techniques and orthogonality constraints to fully explore both omics-specific learning and cross-omics correlation learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%