2022
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-cncp2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MoBioTools: A Toolkit to Setup QM/MM Calculations

Abstract: We present a toolkit that allows for the preparation of QM/MM input files from a conformational ensemble of molecular geometries. The toolkit can be used in command line, so that no programming experience is required, although it presents some features that can also be employed as a python application programming interface. We apply the toolkit in four situations in which different electronic-structure properties of organic molecules in the presence of a solvent or a complex biological environment are computed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To apply the QM/MM-EDA scheme explained above, three different electronic structure calculations are required; one for the complex (pollutant + solvated membrane), one for the solvated membrane, and another one for the pollutant molecule. The Gaussian input files for these calculations have been automatically generated with the MoBioTools package [ 40 , 41 ]. Both the pollutant and membrane input files include the full complex basis set in order to avoid the basis set superposition error in the QM region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To apply the QM/MM-EDA scheme explained above, three different electronic structure calculations are required; one for the complex (pollutant + solvated membrane), one for the solvated membrane, and another one for the pollutant molecule. The Gaussian input files for these calculations have been automatically generated with the MoBioTools package [ 40 , 41 ]. Both the pollutant and membrane input files include the full complex basis set in order to avoid the basis set superposition error in the QM region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the QM/MM calculations were performed with Gaussian16, using the M062X functional and the cc-pVDZ basis set, later increasing the basis set to a cc-pVTZ for the whole system. The QM region was defined with the solute at its center and the number of closest water molecules was increased from 10 to 240, with the remaining solvent molecules included as point charges assigned by the TIP3P model. The MoBioTools toolkit () was used for the definition of each region. To perform the EDA, three single point QM/MM calculations were carried out for each system without periodic boundary conditions but including the whole environment in the MM layer, corresponding to the full system (QM region and MM point charges) and the fragments on which to compute the interaction energy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57][58][59][60][61] The QM region was defined with the solute at its centre and the number of closest water molecules was increased from 10 to 240, with the remaining solvent molecules included as point charges assigned by the TIP3P model. The MoBioTools toolkit 62,63 was used for the definition of each region. To perform the EDA, three single point QM/MM calculations were carried out for each system, corresponding to the full system (QM region and MM point charges) and the fragments on which to compute the interaction energy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%