2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(13)42735-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilizing women at the grassroots to shape health policy: a case study of the Global Campaign for Microbicides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much has been written about the events of the Cambodia trial and whether the trial was ethical (e.g. Forbes and Mudaliar, 2009; Hammer and Lundstrom, 2006; Page-Shafer et al, 2005; Sandy, 2013), but we know less about how research ethics became the ground of engagement and critique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much has been written about the events of the Cambodia trial and whether the trial was ethical (e.g. Forbes and Mudaliar, 2009; Hammer and Lundstrom, 2006; Page-Shafer et al, 2005; Sandy, 2013), but we know less about how research ethics became the ground of engagement and critique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Forbes [ 18 ], on the other hand, underscored other types of agenda-setting strategies that entailed civil societal actors organizing and attending international conferences to present and emphasize scientific research advocating for particular treatment policies, such as the adoption of microbicides drugs for HIV prevention for woman at international AIDS conferences. Similarly, Sasser [ 65 ] shows how activists often present research at conferences linking the importance of investing in population and reproductive rights with climate change programs.…”
Section: Civil Society In Global Health Policymaking Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breakdown in communications between trial participants and clinical trial sites is not uncommon, particularly when involving marginalized populations [ 14 – 16 ]. The absence of clear communication between trial participants and trial investigators contributed to premature trial closures in at least two sites [ 1 , 2 ]. In such trial contexts where project communications falter, trial staff including recruiters, interviewers, screeners, site managers and medical technicians can be put in the position of mediating between participants and researchers.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The community advisory boards (CABs) of these trials comprise community members and researchers with the intention of presenting the concerns of community members to trials in a structured way. In some cases, due to a lack of research literacy, some CABs can struggle to translate research to community members and community concerns to researchers [ 1 , 2 , 16 ]. The challenges of community engagement and participation in clinical trials and HIV prevention research are well documented [ 17 20 ].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation