2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40726-022-00241-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Soils: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar explanations can help for the third phenomenon: for PFHpA w(F) values determined with MS were decisively higher than respective MAS values. PFHpA with t R = 8.2 min was corrected via 13 An extreme of this phenomenon was observed for PFOA and PFOSA where w(F) values were both determined as below LOQ for MAS-quanti cation, while MS-quanti cation led to quanti able results. For the PFOSA, the corresponding uorine concentration in the nal extract determined by MS was below the methodical LOQ of MAS (1.5 µg/L), while the uorine concentration of the corresponding PFOA samples extract determined via MS was higher than the methodical LOQ of MAS (75.0 µg/L).…”
Section: Pfas In Plant Compartments After Single Pfas Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar explanations can help for the third phenomenon: for PFHpA w(F) values determined with MS were decisively higher than respective MAS values. PFHpA with t R = 8.2 min was corrected via 13 An extreme of this phenomenon was observed for PFOA and PFOSA where w(F) values were both determined as below LOQ for MAS-quanti cation, while MS-quanti cation led to quanti able results. For the PFOSA, the corresponding uorine concentration in the nal extract determined by MS was below the methodical LOQ of MAS (1.5 µg/L), while the uorine concentration of the corresponding PFOA samples extract determined via MS was higher than the methodical LOQ of MAS (75.0 µg/L).…”
Section: Pfas In Plant Compartments After Single Pfas Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible explanation for this phenomenon could originate from ionization e ciency correction factors used in this study according to DIN 38414-14 (21) calculated based on the intensity of the corresponding internal standard in the sample normalized to the intensity of this internal standard in external calibration. Hence, internal standard and corrected PFAS are not (inevitable) chemically identical and (can) have differing retention times in LC (see table S2), ionization conditions can differ and over-or underestimation can occur: E.g., PFPeA with a retention time t R = 7.2 min is corrected based on the ionization e ciency of 13 C 2 -PFHxA with t R = 7.8 min.…”
Section: Pfas In Plant Compartments After Single Pfas Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, PFAS have a special molecular structure consisting of a hydrophobic fluoroalkyl chain (repellent to both oil and water liquids) at one end and a hydrophilic functional group (attracted to aqueous liquids) at the other. , These characteristics (e.g., perfluorinated carbon chain length, functionality, and polarity) strongly impact the environmental concentrations of PFAS in the soil and groundwater. Moreover, light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) such as petroleum products affect the mobility and retardation of PFAS in the subsurface. , The colocation of PFAS and LNAPL is quite common at large fuel storage facilities and airportswhereby fuels and PFAS liquids would have been used for fire-fighting training and during incidents …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,13 The colocation of PFAS and LNAPL is quite common at large fuel storage facilities and airports�whereby fuels and PFAS liquids would have been used for fire-fighting training and during incidents. 11 PFAS contamination in the vadose zone has been a source of groundwater contamination for years. This indicates that PFAS contamination sites with little or no control of PFAS release from soils (e.g., mobilization of PFAS in contaminated soil, soil washing, phytoremediation, and immobilization 14 ) can continue as a source of groundwater contamination long after production or disposal activities have ceased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%