2016
DOI: 10.25267/commons.2016.v5.i2.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilization as Communication. A Latin American contribution to the study of social movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Treré and Gerbaudo (2015) point out, in big parts of digital activism literature those accounts are limited due to (1) the dominance of resource mobilisation theory, which centres on material resources and organisational structures; (2) a dominant focus on technology and media institutions; (3) the hegemony of quantitative methods in the social sciences. Given the remaining ethnocentric nature of the field we also find little sensitivity towards contextual accounts of activist groups operating across vastly diverging political, cultural and socio-economic spectra (Escobar, 1995; Sartoretto, 2016).…”
Section: Accounting For Power In Social Movement Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Treré and Gerbaudo (2015) point out, in big parts of digital activism literature those accounts are limited due to (1) the dominance of resource mobilisation theory, which centres on material resources and organisational structures; (2) a dominant focus on technology and media institutions; (3) the hegemony of quantitative methods in the social sciences. Given the remaining ethnocentric nature of the field we also find little sensitivity towards contextual accounts of activist groups operating across vastly diverging political, cultural and socio-economic spectra (Escobar, 1995; Sartoretto, 2016).…”
Section: Accounting For Power In Social Movement Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Same counts for acknowledging contextuality of technologies chosen and the oftentimes-crucial role of combining various means. Those limitations can be linked to a ‘lack of interdisciplinary dialogue and research between the areas of social movements studies and that of media and communications’ (Sartoretto, 2016: 95). A reductionist focus that fails to account for social processes might be rooted in the negligence of tracing a conceptual distinction between the media and communication as human relation in social movement scholarship.…”
Section: Accounting For Power In Social Movement Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a similar note, a growing body of scholarship has observed how the parallel growth of digital media platforms and social movement mobilization have enabled interconnections across spatial boundaries (Downing, 2008;Drinot, 2011;De Jong et al, 2005;Silverstone, 2013). Scholars are in this vein analyzing the dynamics of mobilization in digital media platforms (Bennett & Segerberg, 2013), on-line communication as a constitutive aspect of mobilization (Sartoretto, 2016), its potential for social movement formation (Mattoni & Treré, 2014), its function as a motor of social change (Milan, 2013), and the interplay with direct action on the streets (Gerbaudo, 2012). Studies have documented promising potential in the use of digital media platforms (Leong et al, 2019), how digital media platforms add to a personalization of politics (Bennett & Segerberg, 2012), and how social movements show ambivalence towards their use (Custódio & Sartoretto, 2020;Sartoretto, 2015).…”
Section: Temporality and Social Movement Narrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a Latin American tradition (Sartoretto, 2016), the Brazilian civil society has historically combined media education with sociopolitical education to promote civic knowledge among young people of impoverished backgrounds. These pedagogical initiatives are key elements in processes of communication for social change (CFSC)⁵ in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%