Mobility support across hybrid IP-based wireless environment: review of concepts, solutions, and related issues

Heidarinezhad, Mohammad Reza; Zukarnain, Zuriati Ahmad; Udzir, Nur Izura; Othman, Мohamed

doi:10.1007/s12243-009-0107-0

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 50 publications

(41 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But their scalability is limited within the same subnet. Various mobility management techniques have been surveyed that includes network layer approaches, transport layer approaches and application layer approaches [2,[19][20]. These approaches are discussed as follows:…”

Section: Comparison Of Mobility Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Survey of mSCTP for Transport Layer Mobility Management

Goyal¹,

Kaushal

2013

JAIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless Communications have increased rapidly in recent years. Wireless LAN, Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Universal Mobile Tele-Communication System (UMTS), GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), Bluetooth, 3G (Third Generation networks), and GPS (Global Positioning System), etc., are common wireless technologies that are commercially available. Internet together with small hosts in the form of laptop, mobile phones, etc., has increased the demand of mobility support for moving nodes as when nodes move from one network to another the Internet connectivity should be maintained during handover. In this paper, various protocols for mobility management have been reviewed. Network layer protocols like Mobile IP and its variants and transport layer protocol mSCTP are compared. Various issues regarding mSCTP handover have been investigated like packet re-ordering, throughput, multi-path transfer, handover in case of fast moving nodes so that optimal handover can be achieved.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Mobility Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When a node moves from one network to another the communication with Internet is disconnected due to change of IP address [1]. Mobility can be classified into terminal, personal, session and service mobility [2]. Terminal mobility refers to maintaining the connection and maintaining the session when the network changes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of mSCTP for Transport Layer Mobility Management

Goyal¹,

Kaushal

2013

JAIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, MIP-based mobility is hindered by several limitations, namely unsuitability for performing handovers fast enough for QoS sensitive applications and inadequate support for security [18]. For these limitations, HIP was selected to handle location updates in SMA.…”

Section: Mobilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison and Analysis of Secure Mobile Architecture (SMA) and Evolved Packet System

Pellikka

Skowron

Gurtov

2011

2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-In this paper, we analyse and compare two architectures providing an all-IP based connectivity and mobility for mobile devices over heterogeneous access technologies: Evolved Packet System (EPS) as specified by 3GPP and Secure Mobile Architecture (SMA), a standardization effort by The Open Group (TOG). We briefly present each architecture and qualitatively evaluate their advantages and disadvantages in terms of security, mobility, and support for location-based policy enforcement and security zoning. While SMA is capable of providing simultaneous multihoming, cryptographic identity-based packet tracking and ready support for location-based security zoning and policy control, EPS enables legal interception of user traffic and protection of user/host privacy by default.

show abstract

Vertical Handover Decision Algorithm for Multimedia Streaming in VANET

Hassoune¹,

Maaza²,

Senouci

2017

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceVehicular ad hoc networks represent one of the most important applications of wireless ad hoc networks. In highways, where different networks exist, frequent and sometimes unnecessary switches from one network to another may occur, which degrade network performance and affect applications, especially those that require high quality networks such as multimedia applications (Video conferencing, Video On-Demand, etc.). This work presents an analytical model and a Vertical Handover decision method for Highways called VHH. It is based on position, velocity, jitter, and density as mandatory inputs which aim to both minimize Vertical handover frequency and avoid unnecessary handoffs and ping pong effect between different networks, in the goal of enhancing multimedia streaming services in highways. A simulation is provided to prove the performance of the algorithm

show abstract

Mobility support across hybrid IP-based wireless environment: review of concepts, solutions, and related issues

Cited by 6 publications

References 50 publications

A Survey of mSCTP for Transport Layer Mobility Management

A Survey of mSCTP for Transport Layer Mobility Management

Comparison and Analysis of Secure Mobile Architecture (SMA) and Evolved Packet System

Vertical Handover Decision Algorithm for Multimedia Streaming in VANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About