1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf00906841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of oxygen and catalytic properties of rare earth oxides with respect to oxidation of hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7͑b͔͒. In support of this hypothesis, praseodymium oxide was reported to have the maximum activity in isotopic exchange with molecular oxygen among the RE oxides; 54 19 It must, however, be pointed out that these theoretical calculations apply to the zero temperature/pressure limit and that they refer to bulk materials without considering the properties of thin films under heteroepitaxy constraints ͓indeed, hex-Pr 2 O 3 almost perfectly matches Si͑111͒ ͑ϳ+ 0.5% ͒ but its misfit to Ge ͑ϳ−3.6% ͒ is comparable to the direct mismatch of Ge with respect to Si ͑ϳ4.2% ͒; on the contrary, cub-Pr 2 O 3 represents a more appropriate buffer because its lattice is ϳ2.7% bigger than two times the Si lattice and ϳ1.4% smaller than two times the Ge lattice͔. At this step, no further O is available anymore in the Pr oxide ͓as represented by the absence of the dashed arrow in picture 7͑d͔͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…7͑b͔͒. In support of this hypothesis, praseodymium oxide was reported to have the maximum activity in isotopic exchange with molecular oxygen among the RE oxides; 54 19 It must, however, be pointed out that these theoretical calculations apply to the zero temperature/pressure limit and that they refer to bulk materials without considering the properties of thin films under heteroepitaxy constraints ͓indeed, hex-Pr 2 O 3 almost perfectly matches Si͑111͒ ͑ϳ+ 0.5% ͒ but its misfit to Ge ͑ϳ−3.6% ͒ is comparable to the direct mismatch of Ge with respect to Si ͑ϳ4.2% ͒; on the contrary, cub-Pr 2 O 3 represents a more appropriate buffer because its lattice is ϳ2.7% bigger than two times the Si lattice and ϳ1.4% smaller than two times the Ge lattice͔. At this step, no further O is available anymore in the Pr oxide ͓as represented by the absence of the dashed arrow in picture 7͑d͔͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Pr 3d signal recorded after the plasma treatment [ Fig. 3(b)] clearly shows that previous spectra of PrO 2 did not represent stoichiometric but indeed most probably a reduced PrO 2 . To better illustrate the various contributions, the spectrum was analyzed using a curve fitting routine with a Voigt profile (Fitt 1.2 by Hyun-Jo Kim, Seoul National University).…”
Section: A Xps Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…No direct measurement of the heat of oxygen desorption for CeO 2 could be found. Instead the heat of desorption for CeO 2 was estimated from the reported 67 kJ/mol activation energy in isotopic 16 O 2 / 18 O 2 exchange [50] according to the Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship obtained by Boreskov [46]. However, it must be added that significant ambiguity exists for exchange on ceria with reported activation energies in the 67-131 kJ/mol range [29,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Sources For the Heat Of Oxygen Chemisorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead the heat of desorption for CeO 2 was estimated from the reported 67 kJ/mol activation energy in isotopic 16 O 2 / 18 O 2 exchange [50] according to the Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship obtained by Boreskov [46]. However, it must be added that significant ambiguity exists for exchange on ceria with reported activation energies in the 67-131 kJ/mol range [29,[50][51][52]. In the case of V 2 O 5 the heat of chemisorption is assumed equal to the desorption activation energy from Dziembaj [53], but this value must also be regarded with some caution, as there is significant ambiguity in the literature concerning the heat of oxygen chemisorption on V 2 O 5 with reported values covering the wide range of 40-250 kJ/mol [24,28,53,54].…”
Section: Sources For the Heat Of Oxygen Chemisorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%