2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2337634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of O+ in He and interaction potential of HeO+

Abstract: New experimental measurements are reported for the mobility of O + ions in He gas at 300 K. The accuracy of these new values is estimated as ±2.5%, which allows them to serve as a stringent test of a new ab initio potential that we have calculated using the RCCSD͑T͒ method. We employed the aug-cc-pV5Z basis set with counterpoise corrections and took spin-orbit coupling into account. The present experimental values lie below the calculated ones, but the difference becomes statistically significant only at moder… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the values were affected by small parasitic charges on the guard rings of the drift tube, since such effects would be more pronounced when the drift voltage is very low, as was the case here. This explanation was suggested by our observation 17 that mobilities measured subsequent to the occurrence of an accidental gaseous discharge tended to be too low by several percent, even after several hours of recov-ery from the event. Since we cannot be certain that this was the true cause, we chose to include the data set at 0.96 Torr along with the others.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that the values were affected by small parasitic charges on the guard rings of the drift tube, since such effects would be more pronounced when the drift voltage is very low, as was the case here. This explanation was suggested by our observation 17 that mobilities measured subsequent to the occurrence of an accidental gaseous discharge tended to be too low by several percent, even after several hours of recov-ery from the event. Since we cannot be certain that this was the true cause, we chose to include the data set at 0.96 Torr along with the others.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The same factor of 1.07 was applied in our previous study 17 of O + in He to account for a putative calibration error of the pressure gauge. We now know that the pressure gauge was accurate, but there is no need to revise the conclusions about the accuracy of the interaction potential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations