2006
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/3/4/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of Min-proteins inEscherichia colimeasured by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Abstract: In the bacterium Escherichia coli, selection of the division site involves pole-to-pole oscillations of the proteins MinD and MinE. Different oscillation mechanisms based on cooperative effects between Min-proteins and on the exchange of Min-proteins between the cytoplasm and the cytoplasmic membrane have been proposed. The parameters characterizing the dynamics of the Min-proteins in vivo are not known. It has therefore been difficult to compare the models quantitatively with experiments. Here, we present in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a typical protein diffusion constant of D ¼ 1-10 μm 2 s −1 (42)(43)(44), the rebinding probability drops below 10% when the enzyme reactivation time becomes longer than 10 ms (Fig. 4C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For a typical protein diffusion constant of D ¼ 1-10 μm 2 s −1 (42)(43)(44), the rebinding probability drops below 10% when the enzyme reactivation time becomes longer than 10 ms (Fig. 4C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although these are reasonable barebone steps to be considered, experimental observations to evaluate the quantitative details of the reaction steps have been very limited and few constraints have been imposed on these models. Only bulk diffusion coefficients of proteins have been measured directly (14,36). The surface diffusion coefficients have been estimated from FRAP experiments without analysis of exchange between membrane-bound proteins and solution (14), which turned out to be the leading cause of the fluorescence recovery according to our measurements (SI FRAP Experiments and SI Summary of the Fluorescence Recovery Time Data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…depend on a number of parameters, one of which is the refractive index of solution (29,30). The latter can be affected by the presence of detergents leading to the distortion of the FCS detection volume.…”
Section: Fcs Detection Volume Is Not Affected By the Presence Of Detementioning
confidence: 99%