2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-016-9478-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of Metals and Valorization of Sorted Fine Fraction of Waste After Landfill Excavation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, together the fractions < 0.425 mm and 0.425-6.3 mm constituted about 60 Particle size wt.% of the excavated landfill MSW (3-8 years old) by Jain et al, 2005; where 44.6 wt.% corresponded to the fraction < 0.425 mm and 14.5 wt.% to the fraction 0.425-6.3 mm. Excavated landfill MSW (10 years old waste), which consisted of around 54 wt.% material < 40 mm and about 46 wt.% material > 40 mm, exhibited a slight increase in the amount of the material < 40 mm with depth (Burlakovs, Kaczala et al, 2016;Bhatnagar et al, 2017). The results obtained by Kaartinen et al, 2013 indicated transport of the fraction < 20 mm (5-10 years old excavated MSW) towards the bottom layer of the landfill as well.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, together the fractions < 0.425 mm and 0.425-6.3 mm constituted about 60 Particle size wt.% of the excavated landfill MSW (3-8 years old) by Jain et al, 2005; where 44.6 wt.% corresponded to the fraction < 0.425 mm and 14.5 wt.% to the fraction 0.425-6.3 mm. Excavated landfill MSW (10 years old waste), which consisted of around 54 wt.% material < 40 mm and about 46 wt.% material > 40 mm, exhibited a slight increase in the amount of the material < 40 mm with depth (Burlakovs, Kaczala et al, 2016;Bhatnagar et al, 2017). The results obtained by Kaartinen et al, 2013 indicated transport of the fraction < 20 mm (5-10 years old excavated MSW) towards the bottom layer of the landfill as well.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nonetheless, there have been additional studies where the amount of metals has been found in significant concentrations, such as a study on the content of metallic elements in the fraction < 10 mm, at different depths, of the excavated waste from a MSW landfill (Burlakovs, Kaczala et al, 2016), which unveils that interesting concentrations of several metals with respect to material recovery, i.e. Fe (average concentrations above 10,000 mg/kg), Mg and Zn (average concentrations above 1,000 mg/kg), can be found in the fine fractions of landfilled waste, as well as concentrations above 100 mg/kg of metals like Mn, Ba, Cu, Pb and Sr. Also, results on the fraction < 40 mm show that the metal content (mainly Fe, Al and Cu) was about 0.6 wt.% of the same fraction (Burlakovs, Kriipsalu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Metals Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radu assessed the reliability of FPXRF by AAS [22], whereas some other scholars also used ICP-MS [21,[31][32][33][34] and ICP-AES [35][36][37] to conduct comparison with FPXRF.…”
Section: Correlation and Linear Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scientific studies in the field of element speciation have been addressed to speciation analysis of polluted soils (Øygard et al 2008). Assessment of the mobility of toxic metals in landfill waste fine fractions is shown in details by Burlakovs et al (2016).…”
Section: Probing the Dump Interior Through Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landfill mining in Europe has been performed mostly for experimental purposes with linked ideas to perform environmental remediation with partial recovery of materials and energy (see Table 1) Burlakovs et al 2013Burlakovs et al , 2015Burlakovs et al , 2016 In the early 1980s, New Jersey environmental officials started to talk about that 'Recycling Pays' and scepticism arose as profits from the sale of recycled materials seemingly were unrealistic. Recycling is a SWM option and whether to prevent and provide source reduction, continue landfilling, incinerate waste or do composting were debated.…”
Section: Brief History Of Lfm Case Studies and Development Of Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%