1986
DOI: 10.2307/1914306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility Indices in Continuous Time Markov Chains

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
94
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as in Bosch and Maloney (2005) we employ an overall measure of mobility of the intensity matrix to assess the can be computed following Geweke, Marshall and Zarkin (1986) who extend the work of Shorrocks (1978) in the construction of mobility indices in discrete time to continuous time models. This index satisfies a series of desirable properties such as monotonicity, strong immobility; velocity and freedom from aliasing (see Geweke 1986).…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, as in Bosch and Maloney (2005) we employ an overall measure of mobility of the intensity matrix to assess the can be computed following Geweke, Marshall and Zarkin (1986) who extend the work of Shorrocks (1978) in the construction of mobility indices in discrete time to continuous time models. This index satisfies a series of desirable properties such as monotonicity, strong immobility; velocity and freedom from aliasing (see Geweke 1986).…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both self-employment and formal salaried work, although not in informal salaried, duration is higher among older and more educated workers. Table 4 presents the Geweke, Marshall and Zarkin (1986) mobility index for the three countries, by country, gender age and educational group. Argentina emerges as the country with the least mobility for all groups with Mexico and Brazil more or less similar to each other, with Mexico only slightly more mobile in most of the subgroups.…”
Section: Turnover Duration and Labor Market Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It highlights two di erent c haracteristics in that sequence: (i) the changing shape of the distribution, and (ii) the intradistribution dynamics, how a given part of the distribution at time t transits to another part of the distribution by time t + s. Call (i) and (ii) shape and mobility dynamics. 13 Subsequent analysis will decompose distribution dynamics into these two components.…”
Section: Distribution Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can further clarify M's role by using a mobility index (Geweke, Marshall, and Zarkin [13] or Shorrocks [32]). Analogous to measures of income inequality|summarizing the information in an entire distribution into a single scalar|a mobility index collapses into one number the mobility information in a transition probability.…”
Section: Distribution Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geweke et al (1986) apresentam medidas de mobilidade para o caso contínuo que, segundo os autores evitariam as inconsistências existentes nas propriedades propostas por Shorrocks.…”
Section: Mobilidade Intergeracional: Conceito E Mensuraçãounclassified