Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1062689.1062728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks

Abstract: Previous work on the coverage of mobile sensor networks focuses on algorithms to reposition sensors in order to achieve a static configuration with an enlarged covered area. In this paper, we study the dynamic aspects of the coverage of a mobile sensor network that depend on the process of sensor movement. As time goes by, a position is more likely to be covered; targets that might never be detected in a stationary sensor network can now be detected by moving sensors. We characterize the area coverage at speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
283
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
283
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 shows the variation of max(f p ), avg(f p ), max(f r ), avg(f r ), ∆(f p ) over different speed. We observe no significant variation of avg(f p ), which is encouraging for our approach and confirms that mobility can improve network connectivity as shown by recent papers (8). Note that we observe a significant variation of max(f p ) and max(f r ) from one execution to another, especially for high average speed.…”
Section: Focal Point Failuressupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 11 shows the variation of max(f p ), avg(f p ), max(f r ), avg(f r ), ∆(f p ) over different speed. We observe no significant variation of avg(f p ), which is encouraging for our approach and confirms that mobility can improve network connectivity as shown by recent papers (8). Note that we observe a significant variation of max(f p ) and max(f r ) from one execution to another, especially for high average speed.…”
Section: Focal Point Failuressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In our experiments we have also noticed that the variability of the time pause affects function f p (t) and the increment/decrement of f p (t) during a small time interval (e.g., 10 seconds). For instance, function f p (t) is smoother if the time pause is contained in [8,12] seconds. This is not surprising since the variability of the nodes increases in case of larger pause intervals.…”
Section: Focal Point Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when nodes are mobile, redeployment is possible. In fact, it has been shown [17], [18] that the integration of mobile entities into WSNs improves coverage, and hence, utility of the sensor network deployment. This enables more versatile sensing applications as well [1].…”
Section: Advantages Of Adding Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to fast energy exhaustion of nodes, and hence shortening the lifetime of the network. Many researchers try to overcome the point coverage problem by designing a suitable scheduling strategy for making nodes on and off in such a way that in each time slice, only nodes which can sense the target points in that period are on [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In this method, many nodes are scattered randomly throughout the filed, and the criterion of minimum number of required nodes addressed by the scheduling mechanism which tries to minimize the number of nodes being in on state according to their ability to sense the target points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%