IOR 1991 - 6th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery 1991
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201411258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility control experience in the Joffre Viking miscible carbon dioxide flood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improved gas handling and oil recovery have been reported for SWAG injection at Siri field (Berg et al 2002 andQuale et al 2000), the Joffre Viking (Stephenson et al 1993) CO 2 miscible flood and SWAG emulation at the Rangely CO 2 miscible flood (Attanucci et al 1993). Pilot tests performed on Kuparuk River Field in Alaska Stoisits et al 1995) have also demonstrated the feasibility of SWAG injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The improved gas handling and oil recovery have been reported for SWAG injection at Siri field (Berg et al 2002 andQuale et al 2000), the Joffre Viking (Stephenson et al 1993) CO 2 miscible flood and SWAG emulation at the Rangely CO 2 miscible flood (Attanucci et al 1993). Pilot tests performed on Kuparuk River Field in Alaska Stoisits et al 1995) have also demonstrated the feasibility of SWAG injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…SWAG appears to provide better control of gas mobility than WAG, resulting in improved sweep efficiency in addition to more steady gas production and GOR response (Stephenson et al 1993). In some oil reservoirs (especially offshore) a relatively small amount of produced gas and/or a rapidly falling gas rate makes it uneconomical to develop a gas export solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IOR has been reported for Simultaneous Water And Gas (SWAG) injection at Siri Field (Berge et al 2002;Quale et al 2000), the Joffre Viking CO 2 miscible flood (Stephenson et al 1993) and SWAG emulation at the Rangely CO 2 miscible flood (Attanucci et al 1993). Pilot tests performed in the Kuparul River Field in Alaska (Stoisits et al 1995;Ma et al 1995) have also demonstrated the feasibility of SWAG injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…4 Results of the mobility control test at Joffre Viking C02 miscible flood indicated that simultaneous C02/water injection at water/C02 ratios approaching one resulted in improved sweep compared with water-alternating-C02 injection and continuous C02 injection. If fcasiblẽ~A~w~u ld eliminate the need for separate watcr and gal DJection hnes to the drill sites and gas distribution S\'stems to the wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%