2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3761075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility‐Centric Analysis of Communication Offloading for Heterogeneous Internet of Things Devices

Abstract: Today, the number of interconnected Internet of Things (IoT) devices is growing tremendously followed by an increase in the density of cellular base stations. This trend has an adverse effect on the power efficiency of communication, since each new infrastructure node requires a significant amount of energy. Numerous enablers are already in place to offload the scarce cellular spectrum, thus allowing utilization of more energy-efficient short-range radio technologies for user content dissemination, such as mov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Edge architecture allowed to switch more delay intolerant applications closer to the computation demanders, e.g., Augmented/Virtual/Mixed Reality (AR/VR/MR) gaming, cellular offloading, etc., all together following the proximity-driven nature of the paradigm [ 27 ]. Generally, there are two approaches to the proximity between the Edge and user’s equipment: physical and logical proximity.…”
Section: Background On Computing Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Edge architecture allowed to switch more delay intolerant applications closer to the computation demanders, e.g., Augmented/Virtual/Mixed Reality (AR/VR/MR) gaming, cellular offloading, etc., all together following the proximity-driven nature of the paradigm [ 27 ]. Generally, there are two approaches to the proximity between the Edge and user’s equipment: physical and logical proximity.…”
Section: Background On Computing Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the adopted wireless standard should provide accurate information whether the user is close to another, e.g., below 2m, and not just somewhere in the same building, e.g., within 80-100m radius, which is the typical average coverage of a BLE or WiFi-enabled indoor device. On the other hand, the available wireless connectivity should have enough coverage to connect to the nearby gateway or AP/BS and then to the cloud server, e.g., by using LTE, LoRa, Narrow-band IoT (NB-IoT), Sigfox, or Telensa [21]- [23] depending on the availability on the device. The reliable coverage constraint requires both accurate short-range and robust long-range connectivity solutions installed on the same device.…”
Section: Reliable Range Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the workload may be suddenly increased, so the fog resources are reduced and extra unexpected delay is incurred during the execution of requests 12 . Data or applications always need high processing speeds, and limited bandwidth to process data and costs of data transmission are the issues that should be considered in fog computing 13,14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Data or applications always need high processing speeds, and limited bandwidth to process data and costs of data transmission are the issues that should be considered in fog computing. 13,14 In the last few years, many studies have focused on the discovery and allocation of resources. These studies can be divided into four groups (conducted on IoT, fog/edge, cloud computing, and combined IoT-fog/edge) based on the used platforms for which resource discovery is provided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%