2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility, bioavailability and ecological risk assessment of cadmium and chromium in soils contaminated by paper mill wastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discharges by papermills have previously been associated with pollution of the environment with PTEs, including Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn [51, 52]. This pollution can originate from a number of sources, such as metals in the wood entering the papermill, or atmospheric deposition of metals from the smoke stacks [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discharges by papermills have previously been associated with pollution of the environment with PTEs, including Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn [51, 52]. This pollution can originate from a number of sources, such as metals in the wood entering the papermill, or atmospheric deposition of metals from the smoke stacks [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discharges by papermills have previously been associated with pollution of the environment with PTEs, including Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn [52, 53]. This pollution associated with papermill operations can originate from a number of sources, such as metals in the wood entering the papermill, or atmospheric deposition of metals from the smoke stacks [52].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal pollutants, such as nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd), has become a serious global concern (Carvalho et al 2020;Singh et al 2020). Their contamination of many elements of the environment and ecosystem disrupts the natural biogeochemical cycle (Borah et al 2018; Kumar et al 2019;Guarda et al 2020). They are considered the most dangerous because of their non-biodegradability, ecological risks, toxicity, biogeochemical recycling, extended biological half-lives, and persistence (Bhatia et al 2015;Sharma et al 2018; Kaur et al 2020), and some are poisonous even at extremely low doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%