MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2008.4753313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility Aware Routing for the Airborne Network backbone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pipeline Coding performs worst, because in order to reduce coding delay, it adopts a non-uniform inclusion of original packets into a coded packet. Because of this property, pipelined based random linear coding requires a relatively higher redundancy as discussed in our preliminary report [14]. Unlike Pipeline Coding, under 0% loss, TCP ComboCoding still achieves the same throughput as TCP with no coding, which confirms the fact that ComboCoding does not introduce a penalty in normal network conditions.…”
Section: A Combocoding Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pipeline Coding performs worst, because in order to reduce coding delay, it adopts a non-uniform inclusion of original packets into a coded packet. Because of this property, pipelined based random linear coding requires a relatively higher redundancy as discussed in our preliminary report [14]. Unlike Pipeline Coding, under 0% loss, TCP ComboCoding still achieves the same throughput as TCP with no coding, which confirms the fact that ComboCoding does not introduce a penalty in normal network conditions.…”
Section: A Combocoding Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…(4) ComboCoding differs from [12] Note that in order to deploy our proposed coding scheme, proper modifications on the network layer at the wireless nodes are inevitable as for any network coding implementation. However, modifying the network layer at the node itself is well accepted and is part of the ad hoc network design [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme uses destination sequence numbers to guaranty loop freedom in MANETs. Tiwari proposed another approach to effectively employ Located Based-Adaptive Routing to reduce overhead massages and delay in Mobile ad-hoc networks [8]. In this scheme, each mobile node has geographical location data of itself, its groups and the destination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement this scheme is usually expensive. The reader should be aware that the use of Tree-Seed Algorithm (TSA) to achieve more optimized path in MANETs has been already addressed in [8,9]. An obvious difference between TSA optimization and aforementioned methods is that multiple path from source to destination is selected and routing will be done proportional with the volume of network traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One early study about end-to-end delay in Delay Tolerant Networks is presented in [10]. In their study, which is based on Mobility Aware Routing Protocol and Mobility Dissemination Protocol (MARP/MDP) [11] for airborne networks, authors try to predict the minimum end-to-end delay and obtain the corresponding path for airborne networks. However, they do not address the issues related with carry time and lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%