Mobility at the crossroads – Electric mobility policy and charging infrastructure lessons from across Europe

Sæther, Simen Rostad

doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.01.010

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is intended through urban vehicles access regulations (Tang et al, 2022;Fransen et.al. 2023), charging infrastructure, parking privileges, dedicated road spaces, tax deductions and or financial subsidies and exemptions (Saether, 2022;Rawal et.al., 2023). Recent legislative actions have been imposed by the European Parliament (2023) for which ICEVs commercialization by the automotive industry will be banned starting 2035.…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Explorando las percepciones de los consumidores sobre la tecnología de las motorizaciones en la toma de decisión de compra de vehículos

Hernández-Tamurejo,

Saiz Sepúlveda,

Rodríguez Herráez

et al. 2024

esicm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Se plantea esta investigación empírica para cuantificar el impacto que los factores de incertidumbre ejercen en la toma de decisiones del consumidor respecto a la elección del tipo de vehículo, así como su posterior efecto en la decisión anticipada de aplazar la compra de un vehículo nuevo. Estas influencias se evalúan mediante la percepción de la tecnología por parte del consumidor. Metodología: Se evalúa un modelo estructural desarrollado a partir de la revisión de la literatura y de los enfoques TPB y TAM mediante una muestra de 400 encuestados a través de ecuaciones estructurales (PLS-SEM), que incluye un análisis MGA para determinar efectos mediadores del comportamiento. Resultados: Los resultados confirman que los consumidores desarrollan incertidumbre sobre las políticas adoptadas e influyen significativamente en la percepción sobre las motorizaciones disponibles en el mercado, por lo que los consumidores prefieren posponer la decisión de compra. Limitaciones: Esta investigación debería extenderse a otras regiones para ampliar los enfoques. Como futuras líneas de investigación, un estudio pormenorizado de las razones que subyacen a la incertidumbre demostrada proporcionaría información útil a los gobiernos para permitirles la adaptación de las políticas al contexto socioeconómico. Implicaciones prácticas: Los resultados sugieren que los gobiernos deben reevaluar sus políticas de movilidad para poder lograr los objetivos de sostenibilidad establecidos. El marco normativo actual lleva a los consumidores a retrasar la renovación de sus vehículos más antiguos, lo que da lugar a un parque envejecido que agrava los problemas medioambientales en términos de emisiones de CO2.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Explorando las percepciones de los consumidores sobre la tecnología de las motorizaciones en la toma de decisión de compra de vehículos

Hernández-Tamurejo,

Saiz Sepúlveda,

Rodríguez Herráez

et al. 2024

esicm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Electric and hybrid electric vehicles (EV and HEV) emerge as a promising near-term solution in the transportation sector to diminish the reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants. The suitability of a rechargeable Li-ion battery (LIB) for these vehicles is evident, given their high specific energy density compared to other battery chemistries, among other advantageous features [1,2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Pressure, Temperature and Discharge Rate on the Electrical Performances of a Commercial Pouch Li-Ion Battery

Aiello,

Ruchti,

Vitzthum

et al. 2024

Batteries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, the performances of a pouch Li-ion battery (LIB) with respect to temperature, pressure and discharge-rate variation are measured. A sensitivity study has been conducted with three temperatures (5 °C, 25 °C, 45 °C), four pressures (0.2 MPa, 0.5 MPa, 0.8 MPa, 1.2 MPa) and three electrical discharge rates (0.5 C, 1.5 C, 3.0 C). Electrochemical processes and overall efficiency are significantly affected by temperature and pressure, influencing capacity and charge–discharge rates. In previous studies, temperature and pressure were not controlled simultaneously due to technological limitations. A novel test bench was developed to investigate these influences by controlling the surface temperature and mechanical pressure on a pouch LIB during electrical charging and discharging. This test rig permits an accurate assessment of mechanical, thermal and electrical parameters, while decoupling thermal and mechanical influences during electrical operation. The results of the study confirm what has been found in the literature: an increase in pressure leads to a decrease in performance, while an increase in temperature leads to an increase in performance. However, the extent to which the pressure impacts performance is determined by the temperature and the applied electrical discharge rate. At 5 °C and 0.5 C, an increase in pressure from 0.2 MPa to 1.2 MPa results in a 5.84% decrease in discharged capacity. At 45 °C the discharge capacity decreases by 2.17%. Regarding the impact of the temperature, at discharge rate of 0.5 C, with an applied pressure of 0.2 MPa, an increase in temperature from 25 °C to 45 °C results in an increase of 4.27% in discharged capacity. The impact on performance varies significantly at different C-rates. Under the same pressure (0.2 MPa) and temperature variation (from 25 °C to 45 °C), increasing the electrical discharge rate to 1.5 C results in a 43.04% increase in discharged capacity. The interplay between temperature, pressure and C-rate has a significant, non-linear impact on performance. This suggests that the characterisation of an LIB would require the active control of both temperature and pressure during electrical operation.

show abstract

“…In 2023, 14.2 million new plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) were registered worldwide, which corresponds to an increase of 35% compared to the previous year with 10.5 million PEVs [7,8]. Various studies have indicated that the acceptance and spread of PEVs can be supported by the development of public charging infrastructure (CI) [9][10][11]. In this context, understanding usage behavior is the basis for optimizing the existing and future public CI.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bill It Right: Evaluating Public Charging Station Usage Behavior under the Presence of Different Pricing Policies

Fischer,

Michalk,

Hardt

et al. 2024

WEVJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates for the first time how public charging infrastructure usage differs under the presence of diverse pricing models. About 3 million charging events from different European countries were classified according to five different pricing models (cost-free, flat-rate, time-based, energy-based, and mixed) and evaluated using various performance indicators such as connection duration; transferred energy volumes; average power; achievable revenue; and the share of charging and idle time for AC, DC, and HPC charging infrastructure. The study results show that the performance indicators differed for the classified pricing models. In addition to the quantitative comparison of the performance indicators, a Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance and a pairwise comparison using the Mann–Whitney-U test were used to show that the data distributions of the defined pricing models were statistically significantly different. The results are discussed from various perspectives on the efficient design of public charging infrastructure. The results show that time-based pricing models can improve the availability of public charging infrastructure, as the connection duration per charging event can be roughly halved compared to other pricing models. Flat-rate pricing models and AC charging infrastructure can support the temporal shift of charging events, such as shifting demand peaks, as charging events usually have several hours of idle time per charging process. By quantifying various performance indicators for different charging technologies and pricing models, the study is relevant for stakeholders involved in the development and operation of public charging infrastructure.

show abstract

Mobility at the crossroads – Electric mobility policy and charging infrastructure lessons from across Europe

Cited by 14 publications

References 60 publications

Explorando las percepciones de los consumidores sobre la tecnología de las motorizaciones en la toma de decisión de compra de vehículos

Explorando las percepciones de los consumidores sobre la tecnología de las motorizaciones en la toma de decisión de compra de vehículos

Influence of Pressure, Temperature and Discharge Rate on the Electrical Performances of a Commercial Pouch Li-Ion Battery

Bill It Right: Evaluating Public Charging Station Usage Behavior under the Presence of Different Pricing Policies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About