2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm02668a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility and photovoltaic performance studies on polymer blends: effects of side chains volume fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adam et al32 demonstrated that mixing of (poly{1,4‐ (2,5‐dioctyloxy)‐phenyleneethynylene‐2,5‐thiophenylenevinylene‐1,4‐[(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy)‐2‐methyloxy]phenylenevinylen (DO‐PThE1‐PPV2) and poly{1,4‐(5‐[(2‐ethylhexyl)‐oxy]‐2‐methoxy)‐phenyleneethynylene‐2,5‐thiophenylenevinylene‐1,4‐[(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy)‐2‐methyloxy] phenylenevinylene} (MEH‐PThE1‐PPV2), consisting of the same conjugated backbone but different types and volume fraction of alkoxy side chains on the phenylene ethynylene unit, blended in PCBM resulted in a slight improvement over the binary references. This improvement was attributed to an enhanced charge carrier mobility in the DO‐PThE1‐PPV2:MEH‐PThE1‐PPV2 mixture (μ DO : MEH h = 2.6 × 10 − 4 cm 2 /Vs) as compared to the individual polymers (μ DO : PThE 1 h = 1.8 × 10 − 5 cm 2 /Vs, μ MEH − PThE 1 h = 2 × 10 − 6 cm 2 /Vs).…”
Section: Review Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adam et al32 demonstrated that mixing of (poly{1,4‐ (2,5‐dioctyloxy)‐phenyleneethynylene‐2,5‐thiophenylenevinylene‐1,4‐[(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy)‐2‐methyloxy]phenylenevinylen (DO‐PThE1‐PPV2) and poly{1,4‐(5‐[(2‐ethylhexyl)‐oxy]‐2‐methoxy)‐phenyleneethynylene‐2,5‐thiophenylenevinylene‐1,4‐[(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy)‐2‐methyloxy] phenylenevinylene} (MEH‐PThE1‐PPV2), consisting of the same conjugated backbone but different types and volume fraction of alkoxy side chains on the phenylene ethynylene unit, blended in PCBM resulted in a slight improvement over the binary references. This improvement was attributed to an enhanced charge carrier mobility in the DO‐PThE1‐PPV2:MEH‐PThE1‐PPV2 mixture (μ DO : MEH h = 2.6 × 10 − 4 cm 2 /Vs) as compared to the individual polymers (μ DO : PThE 1 h = 1.8 × 10 − 5 cm 2 /Vs, μ MEH − PThE 1 h = 2 × 10 − 6 cm 2 /Vs).…”
Section: Review Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 The experiment was designed in our lab using a nanosecond laser (OBB OL-401), a function generator and a digital oscilloscope integrated together, operated using a customized Lab-view program. 27,28 The experiment was designed in our lab using a nanosecond laser (OBB OL-401), a function generator and a digital oscilloscope integrated together, operated using a customized Lab-view program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with binary OSCs, ternary systems containing two donors and one acceptor (or one donor and two acceptors) can broaden the absorption range of active layers through complementary absorption of two donors, thereby providing a potentially effective route in achieving high short‐circuit current density ( J sc ) and thus high efficiency . On the other hand, comparing with tandem solar cell structures by using two binary layers, ternary system in one active layer can also exceed the performance of binary solar cells while maintaining simplicity of single active‐layer processing step.…”
Section: Summary Of Photovoltaic Parameters Of Solar Cells With Diffementioning
confidence: 99%