Mobilities and Risks in Coastal Kenya: Jumping Scales Versus Staying Local

Abstract

Removed from the roadsides by waves of “city cleaning” in the early 2000s, Kenyan crafts traders have spent their careers struggling for market access within the port city and tourism hub of Mombasa. An Indian Ocean city in which the mobile and immobile of the global economy converge and interact, some Kenyan traders strive to “jump scales” into international networks, made more possible in the last decade with the help of digital technologies such as cell phones and e‐mail. Based on research conducted between 2001 and 2014, this article explores the stories of two Kenyan crafts traders and how they negotiate the changing relationships and risks of different types of mobility, from everyday travel around Mombasa and Kenya to the mobility made possible by new telecommunication technologies. I focus on emergent strategies for economic advancement and the need to negotiate a variety of formal and informal political, legal, and economic barriers. I demonstrate that translating the new forms of digital technologies and mobility into economic success is contingent on the types of risks accompanying these new mobilities and the capacity for individuals’ social networks to help in gaining access to jobs, land, and new social connections.

Complicated Webs: Experiential Risk in the Vietnamese Coffee Industry

“…The mobility of information through digital technology access (Mahoney 2016) is increasingly important as Vietnamese farmers access new technological tools for agricultural risk management. Similarly, farmers' access to risk assessment and management strategies engenders an understanding of the institutional processes that construct, project, and supposedly mitigate risk.…”

Precarious hope and reframing risk behavior from the ground up: insight from ethnographic research with Rwandan urban refugees in Yaoundé, Cameroon

“…Finally, this research underlines that strategies which in the public health field we qualify as “risky” are not understood the same way by those who engage these strategies [12, 73]. Few studies have acknowledged the insufficiency of identifying “high risk groups” that are more likely to engage in risk behavior, and have sought to assess local beliefs and practices that influence compliance to more effectively focus intervention policy [18, 19].…”