2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilising students’ grammar skills through collaborative e-tivities with Web 2.0 tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaborative learning improves second language teaching and learning particularly academic achievement (Fjermestad, 2004;Faja, 2013;Schmid et al, 2014;Hernández-Sellés, Muñoz-Carril, & González-Sanmamed, 2015;Stoytcheva, 2018;Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999;and Kumar, 2017 ). In online grammar classes, collaborative learning was effective to be applied as it had a positive effect on classroom teaching and learning ( Kovacic, 2012;Khalil, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative learning improves second language teaching and learning particularly academic achievement (Fjermestad, 2004;Faja, 2013;Schmid et al, 2014;Hernández-Sellés, Muñoz-Carril, & González-Sanmamed, 2015;Stoytcheva, 2018;Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999;and Kumar, 2017 ). In online grammar classes, collaborative learning was effective to be applied as it had a positive effect on classroom teaching and learning ( Kovacic, 2012;Khalil, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the literature on the use of Web 2.0 tools in education and training is examined, it is seen that there are studies on different disciplines and research areas showing that Web 2.0 tools increase success, provide an interactive educational environment, support mental skills, have a communicative structure and offer various opportunities compared to traditional textbooks (Ahmed & Opoku, 2022;Akcay & Arslan, 2010;Bamoallem & Altarteer, 2022;Çaka, Doğan Barut, & Şahin, 2015;Çetin, Çalışkan, & Menzi, 2013;Genç, 2010;Gulbahar, Kalelioglu, & Madran, 2010;Gün, 2015;A. Korucu, 2015; A. T. Korucu & Sezer, 2016;Kovacic, Bubas, & Coric, 2012;Krouska, Troussas, & Sgouropoulou, 2022;Kutlu Demir, 2018;Laire, Casteleyn, & Mottart, 2012;Magnuson, 2013;Ng, Ng, & Chu, 2022;Sarsar, Başbay, & Başbay, 2015;Turhan & Bayram, 2017;Virkus & Bamigbola, 2013); increase students' desire to read and write, allow them to have fun while learning and develop positive attitudes (Aytan & Basal, 2015;Baltaci-Goktalay & Ozdilek, 2010;Bolatli & Korucu, 2018;Çetin et al, 2013;Yükseltürk, Altıok, & Üçgül, 2017); foster students' active participation, their interest and motivation and positively affect their perceptions (Aytan & Basal, 2015;Baltaci-Goktalay & Ozdilek, 2010;Bolatli & Korucu, 2018;A. Korucu, 2015;Yükseltürk et al, 2017).…”
Section: 5literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In emerging internet applications, digital creative practice would prove to be an actively pursued pedagogical outcome appropriate for the students, teachers and classrooms of the 21 st century electrate society (Kovacic, Bubas & Coric, 2012). Salmon's (2000Salmon's ( , 2002Salmon's ( , 2004Salmon's ( , 2007 etivities learning model is used as an overarching framework for people interested in creating online pedagogical design of collaborative interactive learning and teaching (Wright, 2015).E-tivities are defined as "frameworks for enhancing active and participative online learning by individuals or groups" (Salmon, 2002, p.3).…”
Section: Expository Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armellini and Aiyegbayo (2009) reported on the findings of using etivities with the focus on Carpe Diem. Kovacic, et al (2012) aimed at presenting experiences using Web 2.0 tools in a tertiary ESP course through e-tivities. All of these studies found that e-tivities supported creative and deeper engagement with the content and fostered pedagogical change in learning design and assessment practices.…”
Section: Expository Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%