2019
DOI: 10.1111/irj.12237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilising for equality? Understanding the impact of grass roots agency and third party representation

Abstract: Does mobilisation theory provide telling insights into the collective expression of gendered grievances? By analysing the dynamics of activism on pay inequality in the British local authority sector, this article offers a negative evaluation, calling for a deeper understanding of grass roots agency and third‐party representation beyond the workplace.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the mandate for a rent by the gym and the appropriation of unpaid labour) generates a common experience of injustice around which to organize – the sine qua non for mobilization (Kelly, 1998, p. 27; cf. Beirne et al. , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the mandate for a rent by the gym and the appropriation of unpaid labour) generates a common experience of injustice around which to organize – the sine qua non for mobilization (Kelly, 1998, p. 27; cf. Beirne et al. , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Its highest-profile courtroom victory of recent years was the successful challenge of employment tribunal fees in 2017 mentioned above (see also Ford, 2018). Other highprofile cases include Vining v London Borough of Wandsworth ([2017] EWCA Civ 1092), involving the consultation rights of parks police as protected by Article 11 ECHR; Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake ([2021] UKSC 8), in which Unison supported a member in her ultimately unsuccessful attempt to establish that the national minimum wage was owed to home care workers during sleep-in shifts (Hayes, 2022); and a series of cases brought during a long running equal pay dispute between thousands of women workers and Glasgow City Council (Beirne, Hurrell, and Wilson, 2019). In 2002, counsel for Unison argued that the right to strike was protected by Article 11 ECHR; an argument which the Strasbourg Court accepted though it then went on to find that the rule at issue could be justified under Article 11, paragraph 2, as a proportionate measure (UNISON v United Kingdom [2002] I.R.L.R.…”
Section: Research Design: Three Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many local authority care services were outsourced in the 1980s and 1990s, which shifted workers beyond the scope of collective bargaining agreements. Furthermore, during the 2000s trade unions were unable to halt the acceleration of outsourcing of care work to avoid the costs associated with the deserved upgrading of mostly female care workers (Beirne et al, 2019). On top of that, some trade union branches pressured women workers to accept inferior deals for back pay in order to protect mostly male manual workers from downgrading (Deakin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Precarious Work In Domiciliary Carementioning
confidence: 99%