2021 13th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iccsn52437.2021.9463655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MobileNet for Differential Constellation Trace Figure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On both datasets, our network achieves AUC values of 0.9999 and 0.9915, respectively, indicating that our network is very close to being a "perfect classifier". Using ResNet-50 as the baseline, our method still achieves a competitive accuracy of 83.00%, which is 2.55% and 4.2% better than MobileNetV3 [49] and GoogLenet [46], respectively, on the LoRa dataset. ICAM [45] and ARFNet [19] also utilize spatial and channel attention mechanisms.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On both datasets, our network achieves AUC values of 0.9999 and 0.9915, respectively, indicating that our network is very close to being a "perfect classifier". Using ResNet-50 as the baseline, our method still achieves a competitive accuracy of 83.00%, which is 2.55% and 4.2% better than MobileNetV3 [49] and GoogLenet [46], respectively, on the LoRa dataset. ICAM [45] and ARFNet [19] also utilize spatial and channel attention mechanisms.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As the distance increases and the SNR decreases, the accuracy of this approach gradually declines. [51] 62.55 33.60 AlexNet [46] 57.25 33.80 GoogLenet [46] 62.05 37.10 ResNet-50 [25] 66.90 37.70 ICAM [45] 66.20 33.75 MobileNetV3 [49] 66.35 37.50 ours 68.40 39.30…”
Section: Impact Of Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation