2010
DOI: 10.1109/mvt.2010.937850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results presented in Figure 8, we can see that a logarithmic fitting of QoE iLT can be used for both satellite imagery and simple map content. This logarithmic relationship corresponds with a well-known WQL hypothesis which shows iLT holds the expected relationship with QoE [24], [48].…”
Section: Establishing the Relationship Between Ilt And Perceived supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the results presented in Figure 8, we can see that a logarithmic fitting of QoE iLT can be used for both satellite imagery and simple map content. This logarithmic relationship corresponds with a well-known WQL hypothesis which shows iLT holds the expected relationship with QoE [24], [48].…”
Section: Establishing the Relationship Between Ilt And Perceived supporting
confidence: 67%
“…This data was collected in several experiments and used to explore the relationship between users' QoE and waiting time for web page, voice, email and file-download web tasks. The dashed lines show results previously presented in [48]. The solid lines show the map and satellite mean iLT results from this work overlaid for comparison.…”
Section: Comparing Ilt To State Of the Art Non-interactive Metricmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobile device quality, mobile software quality, and overall mobile product quality were contextualized from Zamfiroiu (2014), Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002), and Chau and Lai (2003). Measures for network quality and overall mobile provider service quality were adapted from both Ickin et al (2012) and Niida et al (2010) as well as Loiacono et al (2002). Customer intention to switch was contextualized from previous research conducted by Malhotra and Malhotra (2013) and Lam et al (2004).…”
Section: The Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We parametrize x according to the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) for different waiting times from [20], where the authors studied the satisfaction of users when they have to wait for different applications. We map a MOS 4 of satisfied users to U(t exp ) and a MOS 2 of dissatisfied users to U(t infl ).…”
Section: Utility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%