Mobile Self-Monitoring ECG Devices to Diagnose Arrhythmia that Coincide with Palpitations: A Scoping Review

Abstract

The use and deployment of mobile devices across society is phenomenal with an increasing number of individuals using mobile devices to track their everyday health. However, there is a paucity of academic material examining this recent trend. Specifically, little is known about the use and deployment of mobile heart monitoring devices for measuring palpitations and arrhythmia. In this scoping literature review, we identify the contemporary evidence that reports the use of mobile heart monitoring to assess palpitations and arrhythmia across populations. The review was conducted between February and March 2018. Five electronic databases were searched: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), CINHAL, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. A total of 981 records were identified and, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine papers formed the final stage of the review. The results identified a total of six primary themes: purpose, environment, population, wearable devices, assessment, and study design. A further 24 secondary themes were identified across the primary themes. These included detection, cost effectiveness, recruitment, type of setting, type of assessment, and commercial or purpose-built mobile device. This scoping review highlights that further work is required to understand the impact of mobile heart monitoring devices on how arrhythmias and palpitations are assessed and measured across all populations and ages of society. A positive trend revealed by this review demonstrates how mobile heart monitoring devices can support primary care providers to deliver high levels of care at a low cost to the service provider. This has several benefits: alleviation of patient anxiety, lowering the risk of morbidity and mortality, while progressively influencing national and international care pathway guidelines. Limitations of this work include the paucity of knowledge and insight from primary care providers and lack of qualitative material. We argue that future studies consider qualitative and mixed methods approaches to complement quantitative methodologies and to ensure all actors’ experiences are recorded.

Smart Environments and Social Robots for Age-Friendly Integrated Care Services

“…Monitoring the physiological signs and physical position provides valuable information regarding the health status of a person. Some of the main benefits provided by the wearable sensors in monitoring the health status of a person are the following [28]: (i) allow to continuously monitor the vulnerable patients, (ii) allow the medical specialist to have a better view on the patient's health issues and to make the most accurate diagnosis and (iii) offers the patients the opportunity to evaluate their health condition and consult a doctor when appropriate. In [15] the data collected to evaluate the health status of a patient is: physiological signs and physical position.…”

The Role of Electrocardiography in Occupational Medicine, from Einthoven’s Invention to the Digital Era of Wearable Devices

“…Although the new regulatory framework still revolves around intended purpose, the bar for medical device classification has been lowered, because of a broader definition assigned to the term medical purpose. In short, despite the undisputed potential of such apps in the detection of arrhythmias, adhering to appropriate laws and regulations remains a significant hurdle to address [45,46].…”

ECG Monitoring Systems: Review, Architecture, Processes, and Key Challenges

“…However, exiting reviews related to ECG monitoring in the literature can be intuitive and incomprehensive [48]. They do not consider the latest technological trends [49][50][51], and they target very narrow research niches, such as wearable sensors [52][53][54][55], mobile sensors [56], disease diagnosis [57], heartbeat detection [58], emotion recognition [59], or ECG compression methods [60]. Hence, there is a need to provide a comprehensive, expert-verified taxonomy of ECG monitoring systems, a common architecture, and a complete set of processes to guide the classification, analysis, and design of these systems.…”