Mobile Phones, in Combination with a Computer Locator System, Improve the Response Times of Emergency Medical Services in Central London

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to determine whether mobile phones and mobile phone locating devices are associated with improved ambulance response times in central London. PATIENTS AND METHODS All calls from the London Ambulance Service database since 1999 were analysed. In addition, 100 consecutive patients completed a questionnaire on mobile phone use whilst attending the St Thomas's Hospital Emergency Department in central London. RESULTS Mobile phone use for emergencies in central London has increased from 4007 (5% of total) calls in January 1999 to 21,585 (29%) in August 2004. Ambulance response times for mobile phone calls were reduced after the introduction of the mobile phone locating system (mean 469 s versus 444 s; P = 0.0195). The proportion of mobile phone calls made from mobile phones for life-threatening emergencies was higher after injury than for medical emergencies (41% versus 16%, P = 0.0063). Of patients transported to the accident and emergency department by ambulance, 44% contacted the ambulance service by mobile phone. Three-quarters of calls made from outside the home or work-place were by mobile phone and 72% of patients indicated that it would have taken longer to contact the emergency services if they had not used a mobile. CONCLUSIONS Since the introduction of the mobile phone locating system, there has been an improvement in ambulance response times. Mobile locating systems in urban areas across the UK may lead to faster response times and, potentially, improved patient outcomes.

Mobile Phone Use for Contacting Emergency Services in Life-threatening Circumstances

“…Subsequently, one study has shown that mobile phone locating systems led to faster response time in an urban setting (8). Our study has taken a further step to show that the use of mobile phones in contacting emergency services in life-threatening situations could potentially improve patient survival.…”

“…More recently, a UK study showed that mobile phone use for reporting emergencies increased from 5% to 29% of total emergency calls from 1999 to 2004 in London, and the use of mobile phone in combination with a locator system was associated with an improvement in response times to accidents and other emergency situations (8). Automatic provision of location information for emergency calls from mobile phones was not available before September 2003, and accuracy is dependent on the density of network antenna sites (9).…”

Use of Mobile Devices, Social Media, and Crowdsourcing as Digital Strategies to Improve Emergency Cardiovascular Care

“…80 The effectiveness of fibrinolytic therapy for acute stroke is highly time sensitive. 81,82 Patient delay in the recognition of stroke and seeking care has been recognized as a major barrier to optimal treatment of acute stroke.…”

A modified grouping genetic algorithm to select ambulance site locations

“…Of the re-allocating ambulances, 23 out of 27 were at existing sites, 4 were allocated to new sites, the average distance increased for 3 sites (by 319m) and decreased for 20 sites (by 630m (Snyder et al, 2007;Stiell et al, 1999). Specifically, several studies have noted the improved survival of patients with a high risk of mortality when the response time was less than 4 to 5 minutes (Blackwell and Kaufman, 2002;Pons et al, 2005) and have sought to improve the response times through enhancing EMS management and relocating ambulance stations (Gossage et al, 2008;Peleg and Pliskin, 2004).…”