2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phone-based alerting of CPR-trained volunteers simultaneously with the ambulance can reduce the resuscitation-free interval and improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A German, population-based cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
56
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is supported by the current literature (28-30, 16, 24). A recent study revealed higher hospital discharge rate as well as improved neurological outcome in patients treated by CFR dispatched by SBA (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This conclusion is supported by the current literature (28-30, 16, 24). A recent study revealed higher hospital discharge rate as well as improved neurological outcome in patients treated by CFR dispatched by SBA (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the critical outcome of survival with favorable neurological outcome at discharge, we identified very low-certainty evidence from 2 observational studies (downgraded for serious risk of bias) enrolling 2149 OHCAs showing no benefit for having a citizen CPR responder notified of the event via technology or social media (adjusted pooled RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.6À3.4). 344,349 For the critical outcome of survival to hospital discharge/30-day survival, we identified moderate-certainty evidence from 1 RCT (downgraded for serious risk of bias) 348 and very low-certainty evidence (downgraded for serious risk of bias and serious inconsistency) from 4 observational studies. 344,346,349,350 The RCT reported no benefit in 1-month survival between the intervention and the control group (unadjusted RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8À2.1).…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…344,349 For the critical outcome of survival to hospital discharge/30-day survival, we identified moderate-certainty evidence from 1 RCT (downgraded for serious risk of bias) 348 and very low-certainty evidence (downgraded for serious risk of bias and serious inconsistency) from 4 observational studies. 344,346,349,350 The RCT reported no benefit in 1-month survival between the intervention and the control group (unadjusted RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8À2.1). The metaanalysis of adjusted data included 2905 OHCAs (4 studies) and showed benefit in survival to hospital discharge when a citizen CPR responder was notified of the event by a smartphone app with MPS or TM-alert system (adjusted pooled RR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16À2.48; I 2 = 69%; P = 0.02); 98/1000 more patients benefitted with the intervention (95% CI, 22 more patients/1000 to 208 more patients/ 1000 when compared with notification by a smartphone app with MPS or TM-alert system not being offered).…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations