Mobile Phone Access and Implications for Digital Health Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Zimbabwe: Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract

Background Mobile phones may help young people (YP) access health information and support health service engagement. However, in low-income settings there is limited knowledge on YP’s phone and internet access to inform the feasibility of implementing digital health interventions. Objective We investigated access to information and communication technologies among adolescents and young adults in Zimbabwe. Methods A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted from October to December 2018 among YP aged 13-24 years in 5 communities in urban and peri-urban Harare and Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe. Consenting YP completed a self-completed tablet-based questionnaire on mobile phone ownership and use, and use of the internet. The primary outcome was the proportion who reported owning a mobile phone. Secondary outcomes included phone and internet access and use behavior, and ownership and use of other technological devices. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with mobile phone ownership and with internet access, with adjustment for the one-stage cluster sampling design. A priori exploratory variables were age, sex, marital status, and urban/peri-urban residence. Results A total of 634/719 (88.2%) eligible YP, mean age 18.0 years (SD 3.3) and 62.6% (397/634) females, participated. Of the YP interviewed, 62.6% (396/633; 95% CI 58.5-66.5) reported owning a phone and a further 4.3% (27/633) reported having access to a shared phone. Phone ownership increased with age: 27.0% (43/159) of 13-15-year olds, 61.0% (72/118) of 16-17-year olds, 71.5% (103/144) of 18-19-year olds, and 84.7% (171/202) of 20-24-year olds (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5) per year increase. Ownership was similar among females and males: 61.0% (236/387; 95% CI 55.6-66.1) versus 64.8% (153/236; 95% CI 57.8-71.2), age-adjusted OR 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-1.1); higher in those with secondary level education compared to primary or no education: 67.1% (346/516; 95% CI 62.6-71.2) versus 26% (21/82; 95% CI 16.4-37.7), age-adjusted OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-4.8); and similar across other sociodemographic factors. YP reported that 85.3% (361/423) of phones, either owned or shared, were smartphones. Among phone owners, the most commonly used phone app was WhatsApp (71.2%, 282/396), and 16.4% (65/396) reported having ever used their phone to track their health. A total of 407/631 (64.5%; 95% CI 60.3-68.5) currently had access to the internet (used in last 3 months on any device) with access increasing with age (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3 per year increase). In age-adjusted analysis, internet access was higher among males, the unmarried, those with a higher level of education, phone owners, and those who had lived in the community for more than 1 year. The aspect of the internet that YP most disliked was unwanted sexual (29.2%, 136/465) and violent (13.1%, 61/465) content. Conclusions Mobile phone–based ...

Mobile technology access and use among youth in Nairobi, Kenya: implications for mobile health intervention design

“…Our findings are consistent with studies conducted between 2014 and 2020 in other parts of SSA. A 2018 study among youth age 13-24 years in Zimbabwe reported 67% phone access, 57% smartphone access, and higher phone and internet access among older, more highly educated, and male youth (24). A 2014-2016 study among youth aged 18-24 years living with HIV in Uganda reported 94% owned a phone and 37% owned a smartphone, with higher internet use among older youth and men (25).…”

Adapting an evidence-based contraceptive behavioural intervention delivered by mobile phone for young people in Zimbabwe

“…Recent research has suggested that mobile phone interventions may be feasible among young people in Zimbabwe but have the potential to increase inequities if internet access is a prerequisite for intervention receipt [ 12 ]. The current study was in line with this finding, with young people favouring a non-internet dependent intervention.…”

Trends in Emergency Contraception Awareness Among Women and Girls in 28 Sub-Saharan Countries

“…Girls aged 15-19 have relatively low awareness of EC compared to young women aged 20-24 in all countries studied. The differences could be explained by better exposure of young women (aged 20-24) to information sources relative to adolescent girls [20][21][22] .…”