2005
DOI: 10.17487/rfc4283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)

Abstract: Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the local mobility anchor includes the mobile node Home Network Prefix (MN-HNP) option [RFC5213] and the MN-ID option [RFC4283] to indicate to the mobility access gateway the identity of the PMIPv6 binding that needs to be terminated. When the mobile access gateway receives the Binding Revocation Indication message, the mobile access gateway responds to the local mobility anchor by sending a Binding Revocation Acknowledgement message.…”
Section: Binding Revocation Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the local mobility anchor includes the mobile node Home Network Prefix (MN-HNP) option [RFC5213] and the MN-ID option [RFC4283] to indicate to the mobility access gateway the identity of the PMIPv6 binding that needs to be terminated. When the mobile access gateway receives the Binding Revocation Indication message, the mobile access gateway responds to the local mobility anchor by sending a Binding Revocation Acknowledgement message.…”
Section: Binding Revocation Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [RFC4285], the MN uses the Mobile Node Identifier Option, specifically the MN-NAI mobility option (as defined in [RFC4283]) to identify itself. The HA MUST copy the MN-NAI mobility option value to the User-Name AVP in the subsequent request messages.…”
Section: Support For the Mobile Ipv6 Authentication Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LMA-provided identity in the User-Name AVP is strongly RECOMMENDED to be the same as the MN's identity information in the PBU MN-ID [RFC4283] [RFC5213] mobility option. The identity SHOULD also be the same as used on the MAG-to-HAAA interface, but in case those identities differ the HAAA MUST have a mechanism of mapping the MN identity used on the MAG-to-HAAA interface to the identity used on the LMA-to-HAAA interface.…”
Section: General Operation and Authorization Of Pbumentioning
confidence: 99%