Mobile IPv6 in Internet of Things: Analysis, experimentations and optimizations

Montavont, Julien; Roth, Damien; Noël, Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.11.001

Cited by 39 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the meantime, for several of the mentioned applications the mobility of the nodes can be managed through IEEE 802.15.4e MAC layer rather than incorporating the MIPv6 protocol to handle this issue. Hence, the overhead of the IPv6 protocol can be omitted, since such protocols have been seen to have high overhead over limited power devices [6]. Accordingly, the TSCH and LLDN modes will be under the scope to handle node mobility.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of mobility on the IoT MAC infrastructure: IEEE 802.15.4e TSCH and LLDN platform

Al-Nidawi

Yahya

Kemp

2015

2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Realizing the target of high reliability and availability is a crucial concept in the IoT context. Different types of IoT applications introduce several requirements and obstacles. One of the important aspects degrading network performance is the node mobility inside the network. Without a solid and adaptive mechanism, node mobility can disrupt the network performance due to dissociations from the network. Hence, reliable techniques must be incorporated to tackle the overhead of node movement. In this paper, the overhead of mobility on both IEEE 802.15.4e timeslotted channel hopping (TSCH) and low latency deterministic (LLDN) modes is investigated. These two modes can be considered as the MAC layer of the IoT paradigm because of their importance and resilience to different network obstacles. In addition, the set of metrics and limitations that influence the network survivability will be identified to ensure efficient mobile node handling process. Both TSCH and LLDN have been implemented via the Contiki OS to determine their functionality. TSCH has been demonstrated to have better node connectivity due to the impact of frame collision in LLDN. In addition, by neglecting the overhead of collision, the LLDN has been shown to have better connectivity and low radio duty cycle (RDC).Index Terms-IEEE 802.15.4e, TSCH, LLDN, Node mobility, Contiki OS.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of mobility on the IoT MAC infrastructure: IEEE 802.15.4e TSCH and LLDN platform

Al-Nidawi

Yahya

Kemp

2015

2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…M m is the mobility metric and it is estimated according to the mobility scenario. In order to calculate M m the following formula is used [15]:…”

Section: B Gtm-rpl Game Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This allows transmission of IP packets with a maximum transmission unit (MTU) of 1280 bytes over IEEE 802. 15.4 links which allow a maximum of only 127 bytes for data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Game Theoretic Optimization of RPL for Mobile Internet of Things Applications

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The number of devices in the world is increasing radically due to technological progressions, real life application advancements and practices of numerous smart diversified machineries in almost every corner of human life (such as environmental monitoring, energy management, media, infrastructure management, medical and healthcare systems and transportation) [1][2] [3]. This rapid development in applications shows that in near future there will be stable and steady stream of innovative applications and services through Internet of Things.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%