2014
DOI: 10.1108/ilds-08-2014-0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile information services in libraries: a review of current trends in delivering information

Abstract: Purpose – This paper aims to review the literature on mobile information services. It considers only peer-reviewed papers published in English between 2004 and 2014. Design/methodology/approach – The method of systematic review was adopted to collect and analyse the relevant literature. The searches were conducted during the last week of July 2014 on different databases, and in total, 76 papers were considered after applying inclusion an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed largely to the shift of emphasis from a humanistic to a more technological approach, and from the traditional paradigm of "library services" to the information paradigm mostly adopted by LIS education. Moreover, the swift from the technologically savvy individuals, to experts in the use of mobile technology (Baggett and Williams, 2012;Vassilakaki, 2014) and social networking sites (Vassilakaki andGaroufallou, 2014a, b, 2015) which are particularly popular among young people (Dickson and Holley, 2010). The highly cited factor "enjoyment of research" could be explained as the gradual transformation of LIS field from a profession linked with practical applications, to an uniform area of information science and to an academization of the LIS education and of the role of information professionals in the research process (Audunson, 2002;Moniarou-Papaconstantinou and Tsatsaroni, 2008;Vassilakaki and Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, 2015;Wilson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be attributed largely to the shift of emphasis from a humanistic to a more technological approach, and from the traditional paradigm of "library services" to the information paradigm mostly adopted by LIS education. Moreover, the swift from the technologically savvy individuals, to experts in the use of mobile technology (Baggett and Williams, 2012;Vassilakaki, 2014) and social networking sites (Vassilakaki andGaroufallou, 2014a, b, 2015) which are particularly popular among young people (Dickson and Holley, 2010). The highly cited factor "enjoyment of research" could be explained as the gradual transformation of LIS field from a profession linked with practical applications, to an uniform area of information science and to an academization of the LIS education and of the role of information professionals in the research process (Audunson, 2002;Moniarou-Papaconstantinou and Tsatsaroni, 2008;Vassilakaki and Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, 2015;Wilson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mas o que significa ser móvel? O estudo ou "conceito de bibliotecas móveis emergiu recentemente após a disseminação generalizada" (p. 180) de DM afirma Vassilakaki (2014). Segundo a autora, antes do fenômeno móvel, o termo era utilizado para designar bibliotecas físicas em movimento, para levar "livros e serviços básicos de informação para áreas rurais", contudo, atualmente a "biblioteca móvel" é "novo campo de pesquisa" e se refere aos "serviços de informação oferecidos aos usuários" para acesso em DM.…”
Section: O Desafio Da Mobilidadeunclassified
“…As student adoption of mobile technology becomes widespread, academic and public libraries have hastened their plans for a mobile Internet presence (Vassilakaki, 2014). The terms "mobile library" or "m-library" were coined to denote information services (i.e., "text a librarian") and digital resources (i.e., online articles) accessed using mobile technology including smartphones, tablets, and wearable devices such as smartwatches.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%