2020
DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review

Abstract: Objectives Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) can face a number of potential healthcare-related barriers, for which mobile health (mHealth) technology can be potentially beneficial. This review aimed to understand the frequency, current uses, and potential barriers with mHealth usage among persons with MS. Methods A query string was used to identify articles on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore that were published in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in the introduction, there are currently few mobile apps for fatigue management in MS. A review of mHealth in MS by Gromisch et al [ 66 ] identified 3 mHealth-based apps and 1 web-based platform that promote fatigue self-management through a variety of approaches [ 66 ]. These include cognitive behavior therapy principles (MS Energise, which draws upon the FACETS program [ 30 - 32 ]), gamification of energy management via stamina credits (More Stamina [ 67 , 68 ]), and use of validated self-assessments and medication and activity diaries (MSMonitor; web-based platform) [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the introduction, there are currently few mobile apps for fatigue management in MS. A review of mHealth in MS by Gromisch et al [ 66 ] identified 3 mHealth-based apps and 1 web-based platform that promote fatigue self-management through a variety of approaches [ 66 ]. These include cognitive behavior therapy principles (MS Energise, which draws upon the FACETS program [ 30 - 32 ]), gamification of energy management via stamina credits (More Stamina [ 67 , 68 ]), and use of validated self-assessments and medication and activity diaries (MSMonitor; web-based platform) [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple examples of tools that were considered useful prior to roll-out but failed to be adopted in any meaningful way. There could be a variety of reasons for this, including poor usability (usually due to not involving relevant clinicians or patients in the development of the tool) and lack of appropriate dissemination [ 53 , 54 ]. Such potential barriers were considered throughout the development of the MSProDiscuss tool, with the long-term aim of promoting adoption.…”
Section: Barriers To Clinical Adoption Of Digital Cds Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 COVID-19 seems to have had a negative effect on cognition-related services, primarily due to decreased face-to-face services and reduced access to services. Although remote-based testing has been shown to be feasible in MS [17][18][19][20] and there is growing utilization of mobile health tools for cognitive evaluations and training, 21 clinicians and patients may experience barriers that…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides ensuring that the assessment is being performed in a secure location with a strong internet connection, clinicians may consider brief trainings with the device if the patient is unfamiliar with it and making adjustments to improve ease-of-use (eg, larger text if there are visual impairments). 21 Although this study has several strengths, such as the inclusion of multiple professions, an evaluation of changes during the past decade, and the influence of COVID-19 on services, there are limitations to consider. Despite multiple recruitment efforts, only 56 clinicians participated, representing slightly more than a quarter of the sample size of the 2010 survey 8 and less than 3% of the current CMSC membership.…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%