2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile diaries – Benchmark against metered measurements: An empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of experience tracking as a data collection method enabled us to assess the effects of our metric on brand purchases overall, as well as in the digital and traditional channels, but there are also limitations of this method. We illustrated its robustness by comparing self-reported data with aggregated data obtained from media research companies (see also Lovett and Peres (2018)). However, because it relies on self-reporting, our data collection method cannot detect brand encounters below perceptual thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefits of experience tracking as a data collection method enabled us to assess the effects of our metric on brand purchases overall, as well as in the digital and traditional channels, but there are also limitations of this method. We illustrated its robustness by comparing self-reported data with aggregated data obtained from media research companies (see also Lovett and Peres (2018)). However, because it relies on self-reporting, our data collection method cannot detect brand encounters below perceptual thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also reduces the cognitive burden associated with recalling brand encounters and the memory decay that can arise with retrospective surveys (Danaher and Dagger, 2013). For an overview of this data collection method, see Baxendale et al (2015) or Lovett and Peres (2018). To report on their brand encounters, respondents answered three questions through a smartphone app: Which brand is encountered?…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile diaries are a trending tool to collect repeated self-reports about experiences. They have been used as a research tool in variety of domains including psychology, geography, health, medicine (e.g., Hektner et al 2007;Heinonen et al 2012;Hensel et al 2012;Hofmann and Patel 2015), marketing practice, and recently also by academic researchers (Lovett and Peres 2018). In mobile diary visual studies, respondents are usually asked to take photos of certain experiencesfor example, photograph what they see on the shelf, windows of stores they stop by, or the content of their refrigerator.…”
Section: Directly Elicited Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as discussed in the preceding section (measures and indicators of these states having been derived from stages 2 and 3). These temporal effects could be addressed through an app mediated 'diary' (see Lovett and Peres 2018) or app based record approach or (less reliably) through self-reporting/recall (possibly through depth methods) or again, through neuroscience applications. A form of observational experiment is a possibility, during which a smartphone is issued to participants tasked with choosing a given high involvement product (perhaps with the limit of one week).…”
Section: ] Transitional Temporal and Longitudinal Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroscience methods may also have a place in mapping the cognitive morphology during variant lab-based purchase tasks on different cohorts with differential use of smart technology (see Braeutigam et al, 2019 or Wilmer et al, 2019). Mobile diaries are another possibility; Lovett and Peres (2018) examine the efficacy of this form of data capture in a consumer research context.…”
Section: Theory Development Corroboration and Empirical Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%