Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1186655.1186665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile data broadcasting over MBMS tradeoffs in forward error correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to studies in cellular networks [8,9], we find that in 802.11a/g WLANs the PHY modulation/rate that optimizes uncoded multicast performance is also close to that for fountain-coded multicast traffic. This is potentially an important observation as it indicates that in 802.11a/g WLANs cross-layer design for multicast rate-control would bring few benefits and PHY layer rate-control can be carried out without regard to the use of fountain coding at higher layers.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to studies in cellular networks [8,9], we find that in 802.11a/g WLANs the PHY modulation/rate that optimizes uncoded multicast performance is also close to that for fountain-coded multicast traffic. This is potentially an important observation as it indicates that in 802.11a/g WLANs cross-layer design for multicast rate-control would bring few benefits and PHY layer rate-control can be carried out without regard to the use of fountain coding at higher layers.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The joint performance of a fountain code concatenated with a PHY layer code has previously been considered in [8,9] in the context of 3G cellular networks, and more recently in [5][6][7] in a general wireless context. In both cases it is concluded that when fountain codes are used at higher-layers then the overall system performance is improved if the PHY layer modulation/rate is selected to operate at much higher packet error rate (a 20%-30% loss rate in [9]) than would normally be used for uncoded traffic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luby et al [26] also considered employing two layers of EEP FEC at the AL and the PL for MBMS download delivery in UMTS. They investigated the trade-off between the AL FEC and PL FEC codes, and studied the advantages of the AL FEC on the system performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to S-I and S-II where the corrupted frames are considered lost. This setup represents the cross-layer FEC schemes proposed in [5,10,11,[26][27][28][29][30][31]46].…”
Section: S-i S-ii S-iii S-ivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even the most recent (including those actually within the standardization phase) do provide only a limited adaptivity. Turbo- [2], Fountain- [3] and RaptorCodes [4], [5] have revolutionized forward error coding (FEC) as they approach the Shannon-bound very closely (depending on the channel characteristic down to a few tenth of a dB). The way to achieve this, however, is to overcome the prohibitive increase in complexity 1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2733.txt 2 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4585.txt when designing long codes (the complexity for RS-codes grows with a small power of the block length while that one of Raptor-codes approximately increases linearly).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%