Mobile Apps for Dietary and Food Timing Assessment: Evaluation for Use in Clinical Research

Abstract

Background Over the last decade, health mobile apps have become an increasingly popular tool used by clinicians and researchers to track food consumption and exercise. However, many consumer apps lack the technological features for facilitating the capture of critical food timing details. Objective This study aimed to introduce users to 11 apps from US app stores that recorded both dietary intake and food timing to establish which one would be the most appropriate for clinical research. Methods To determine a viable app that recorded both dietary intake and food timing for use in a food timing–related clinical study, we evaluated the time stamp data, usability, privacy policies, the accuracy of nutrient estimates, and general features of 11 mobile apps for dietary assessment that were available on US app stores. The following apps were selected using a keyword search of related terms and reviewed: text entry apps—Cronometer, DiaryNutrition, DietDiary, FoodDiary, Macros, and MyPlate; image entry apps—FoodView and MealLogger; and text plus image entry apps—Bitesnap, myCircadianClock, and MyFitnessPal. Results Our primary goal was to identify apps that recorded food time stamps, which 8 (73%) of the 11 reviewed apps did. Of the 11 apps, only 4 (36%) allowed users to edit the time stamps. Next, we sought to evaluate the usability of the apps using the System Usability Scale across 2 days, and 82% (9/11) of the apps received favorable scores for usability. To enable use in research and clinical settings, the privacy policies of each app were systematically reviewed using common criteria, with 1 (9%) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant app (Cronometer). Furthermore, protected health information was collected by 9 (82%) of the 11 apps. Finally, to assess the accuracy of the nutrient estimates generated by these apps, we selected 4 sample food items and a 3-day dietary record to input into each app. The caloric and macronutrient estimates of the apps were compared with the nutrient estimates provided by a registered dietitian using the Nutrition Data System for Research database. In terms of the 3-day food record, the apps were found to consistently underestimate daily calories and macronutrients compared with the Nutrition Data System for Research output. Conclusions Overall, we found that the Bitesnap app provided flexible dietary and food timing functionality capable of being used in research and clinical settings, whereas most other apps lacked in the necessary food timing functionality or user privacy.

Exploring Nutritional Influence on Blood Glucose Forecasting for Type 1 Diabetes Using Explainable AI

“…This is not an easy task in practical AP applications, since it would pose a heavy burden on the patients. However, it is worth noting that ongoing research to develop applications for automatic identification of food composition [71], [72] could help gather information on nutrients. Another aspect that should be addressed relates the input features used for the prediction of postprandial glycemic levels: in fact, these have been selected based on theoretical and physiological considerations [23], [61], and available data, but may not capture all relevant variables.…”

Digital biomarkers: 3PM approach revolutionizing chronic disease management — EPMA 2024 position

“…Energy consumption, macronutrient distribution, carbohydrate intake, and meal timing can be tracked. These biomarkers help individuals make informed decisions about food choices and maintain a healthy diet [ 44 ] Stress levels Chronic stress can impact blood glucose levels and overall well-being. Wearable devices or smartphone apps can assess stress levels through measures including skin conductance, HRV, and self-reported stress scales.…”