2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile applications in oncology: A systematic review of health science databases

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(290 reference statements)
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One may argue that sophisticated apps require more maintenance and therefore a higher payment; however, that review noted that the costs of the apps were unrelated to their respective quality or service performance. This was also evident in a review of high‐quality cancer management apps all based on peer‐reviewed RCTs, where of 21 apps, all were free to download from the app store 23 . In the present study, while most apps were free to download, the mean price of apps that required once‐off payments increased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…One may argue that sophisticated apps require more maintenance and therefore a higher payment; however, that review noted that the costs of the apps were unrelated to their respective quality or service performance. This was also evident in a review of high‐quality cancer management apps all based on peer‐reviewed RCTs, where of 21 apps, all were free to download from the app store 23 . In the present study, while most apps were free to download, the mean price of apps that required once‐off payments increased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…31,32 This could be achieved by introducing alternative modes of service delivery (eg, telemedicine) 31 and strategies to improve adherence to preventive behavior (eg, mobile phone app). 33 The multidisciplinary team should be coordinated by a clinical manager, who would generally be the referring doctor at each phase of the treatment (oncologist, neurosurgeon, orthopedist, child neuropsychiatrist, physiatrist).…”
Section: Results and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that preventive rehabilitation programs should be developed with available resources that capitalize on the skills of the multidisciplinary team in the promotion of physical activity at all phases of the cancer trajectory 31,32 . This could be achieved by introducing alternative modes of service delivery (eg, telemedicine) 31 and strategies to improve adherence to preventive behavior (eg, mobile phone app) 33 …”
Section: Results and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices provide real-time point of care information in bite-sized portions that can support learning and clinical care [18,19]. Various apps for cancer diagnosis, clinical decision support, symptom assessment, pain management, chemotherapy planning, dose calculations, drug interactions and research data collection are currently in use in oncology clinics [20]. Virtual reality (VR) simulation refers to the creation of scenarios as complex, computer-generated images.…”
Section: Highly Interactive Technology-based Solutions In Medical Edumentioning
confidence: 99%