PsycTESTS Dataset 2015
DOI: 10.1037/t84405-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Application Rating Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These scores were then converted to a score out of five using a 5-point Likert-type scale, thus creating a total or overall app quality score out of 5 A score out of 5 is established so that it can be easily interpreted like the overall star ratings found in app descriptions. This was done because there is a high correlation between the MARS quality total score and its overall star rating therefore indicating that the overall MARS quality scores can capture the perceived overall quality described by the star rating (31). Another reason this process was done is because the MARS score and its subscale scores consist of high interrater reliability and internal consistency (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These scores were then converted to a score out of five using a 5-point Likert-type scale, thus creating a total or overall app quality score out of 5 A score out of 5 is established so that it can be easily interpreted like the overall star ratings found in app descriptions. This was done because there is a high correlation between the MARS quality total score and its overall star rating therefore indicating that the overall MARS quality scores can capture the perceived overall quality described by the star rating (31). Another reason this process was done is because the MARS score and its subscale scores consist of high interrater reliability and internal consistency (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a 2020 study found that the MARS tool has good to excellent reliability and objectivity (32). The MARS has a high level of interrater reliability that is ensured by using multiple raters who have been either trained or developed a shared understanding of the target group of apps (31). In this study, two reviewers were trained on how to use the MARS and assess apps.…”
Section: Mars Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations