Mobile Application for Home Healthcare: Physician’s Expectations and Perceptions

Senillosa, Mónica Beatríz; Saimovici, Javier; Brieux, Humberto F. Mandirola; Rabinovich, Diego; Galván, Camila Sofía; Jáuregui, Oscar Ignacio; Lede, Daniel A. Rizzato; Otero, Carlos; Luna, Daniel

doi:10.3233/shti220060

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite these drawbacks, the survey provides explanations for each code, collects both dental and gingival status, and provides a summary of each participant’s data, along with the data collection status for each participant. Similar to other mobile apps such as the electronic medical records app [ 46 ] and Ru Tan Ya app [ 47 ], Tooth Memo enhances the effectiveness of self-care, improves continuity of care, simplifies data collection, decreases overhead costs, reduces mortality in various kinds of patients, saves time for professionals, and helps to avoid transcription errors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time Efficiency, Reliability, and User Satisfaction of the Tooth Memo App for Recording Oral Health Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Detsomboonrat,

Pisarnturakit

2024

JMIR Form Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Digitalizing oral health data through an app can help manage the extensive data obtained through oral health surveys. The Tooth Memo app collects data from oral health surveys and personal health information. Objective This study aims to evaluate the evaluate the time efficiency, reliability, and user satisfaction of the Tooth Memo app. Methods There are 2 sections in the Tooth Memo app: oral health survey and personal oral health record. For the oral health survey section of the Tooth Memo app, different data entry methods were compared and user satisfaction was evaluated. Fifth-year dental students had access to the oral health survey section in the Tooth Memo app during their clinical work. The time required for data entry, analysis, and summary of oral health survey data by 3 methods, that is, pen-and-paper (manual), Tooth Memo app on iOS device, and Tooth Memo app on Android device were compared among 3 data recorders who entered patients’ information on decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth (DMFT) index and community periodontal index (CPI), which were read aloud from the database of 103 patients by another dental personnel. The interobserver reliability of the 3 different data-entering procedures was evaluated by percent disagreement and kappa statistic values. Laypeople had access to the personal oral health record section of this app, and their satisfaction was evaluated through a Likert scale questionnaire. The satisfaction assessments for both sections of the Tooth Memo app involved the same set of questions on the app design, usage, and overall satisfaction. Results Of the 103 dental records on DMFT and CPI, 5.2% (177/3399) data points were missing in the manual data entries, but no data on tooth status were missing in the Android and iOS methods. Complete CPI information was provided by all 3 methods. Transferring data from paper to computer took an average of 55 seconds per case. The manual method required 182 minutes more than the iOS or Android methods to clean the missing data and transfer and analyze the tooth status data of 103 patients. The users, that is, 109 fifth-year dental students and 134 laypeople, expressed high satisfaction with using the Tooth Memo app. The overall satisfaction with the oral health survey ranged between 3 and 10, with an average (SD) of 7.86 (1.46). The overall satisfaction with the personal oral health record ranged between 4 and 10, with an average (SD) of 8.09 (1.28). Conclusions The Tooth Memo app was more efficacious than manual data entry for collecting data of oral health surveys. Dental personnel as well as general users reported high satisfaction when using this app.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%