2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile App–Based Intervention for Adolescents With First-Episode Psychosis: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Introduction: Previous studies have shown an improvement in the access to treatment for patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP), specifically young patients, through mobile app–based interventions. The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of a mobile app–based intervention to improve community functioning in adolescents with FEP. Mobile app–based interventions could increase quality of life and disease awareness, which improve adherence to treatment and reduce the frequency of relapses and rehosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both experimental approaches, group session attendance and EMAs completion rates aligned with those found in the proof-of-concept trial and by other mobile health studies conducted in SSD ( Barbeito et al, 2019 ; Biagianti et al, 2016a ; Fulford et al, 2020 ; Granholm et al, 2013 ; Schlosser et al, 2018 ); high enrolment, retention, and remote assessment completion rates were comparable to those reported by studies testing mobile apps in patients with psychotic disorders ( Barbeito et al, 2019 ; Bucci et al, 2018 ; Fulford et al, 2020 ; Kumar et al, 2018 ; Meyer et al, 2018 ; Niendam et al, 2018 ; Schlosser et al, 2018 )—which corroborates the feasibility of remotely delivering assessments and treatments to people with SSD. Engagement with SCT or GCT exercises, however, was lower than anticipated across both groups, likely attributed to being encouraged, but not required, to complete 2 h of weekly training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In both experimental approaches, group session attendance and EMAs completion rates aligned with those found in the proof-of-concept trial and by other mobile health studies conducted in SSD ( Barbeito et al, 2019 ; Biagianti et al, 2016a ; Fulford et al, 2020 ; Granholm et al, 2013 ; Schlosser et al, 2018 ); high enrolment, retention, and remote assessment completion rates were comparable to those reported by studies testing mobile apps in patients with psychotic disorders ( Barbeito et al, 2019 ; Bucci et al, 2018 ; Fulford et al, 2020 ; Kumar et al, 2018 ; Meyer et al, 2018 ; Niendam et al, 2018 ; Schlosser et al, 2018 )—which corroborates the feasibility of remotely delivering assessments and treatments to people with SSD. Engagement with SCT or GCT exercises, however, was lower than anticipated across both groups, likely attributed to being encouraged, but not required, to complete 2 h of weekly training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…When planning the Psychotherapy app, Barbeito et al [24] wrote a protocol for a focus group, to gain insight into the opinions of young people with psychosis in Spain [24]. The app, comprised of five modules outlined in Table 1, will be studied to assess its ability to decrease the number of relapses and rehospitalizations in 50 patients with first-episode psychosis, aged 14-19 years, when compared to treatment as usual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the apps reviewed offered social and peer support as their main feature or intervention [17,22-24,26,35]. For example, HORYZONS incorporates peer moderators in the “café” feature where youth with mental illness can share their lived experiences to help participants navigate issues they may be facing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 13 full-text articles read, 4 articles were excluded. The first excluded study was a pilot study evaluating the effect of a multimodal smartphone application (psychoeducation, cognitive remediation, peer discussion forum) of which the mindfulness-based intervention represented only a small part that could not be evaluated without substantial bias (26). One study did not provide any details about the mindfulness-based intervention, and one study included patients with chronic schizophrenia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%