Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) routing protocols comparison for wireless sensor network

Kassim, Murizah; Rahman, Ruhani Ab; Mustapha, Roihan

doi:10.1109/icsengt.2011.5993439

Cited by 29 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Average jitter: From the figure 1 he says that DSR have highest jitter value. (ii) The author in [9] compare AODV and TORA protocol based on the parameters throughput and delay with different number of nodes. Throughput: From figure 4 author says that when we consider less number of nodes (less than 25) throughput of both the network are similar to each other.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks

Cynthia¹,

Bandi²,

Magulluri³

et al. 2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Wireless sensor networks and ad hoc networks nodes have a freedom to move from one place to another, they are self-configuring this type of the structure fulfil the requirements of several application. A survey on the different MANET protocols will be done in this paper. Mainly this paper will focus on the Quality of Service on the different parameters like Throughput and Delay between different protocols like AODV (Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector), DSDV (Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and TORA (Temporary Ordered Routing Algorithm). DSDV is called as proactive protocol because they know everything about the nodes in the network before the communication start. DSR, AODV, TORA protocols are called reactive protocol because nodes in this network do not know anything about network. They are also called ON-DEMAND routing protocols. After this analysis you will come to know which MANET protocol is best for different application.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks

Cynthia¹,

Bandi²,

Magulluri³

et al. 2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In recent years, several routing protocols have been specifically proposed for WSNs [6], whereas some others, originally conceived for MANETs, have been tested and adopted in the WSN domain showing good performance results [19], [20]. In general, routing protocols may be classified into proactive protocols (also known as table-driven protocols), reactive protocols (also known as source-initiated or on-demand protocols) and hybrid protocols.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gossiping-Based AODV for Wireless Sensor Networks

Galzarano

Savaglio

Liotta

et al. 2013

2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless sensor networks have been widely used in many different applications and in the future they will play an increasingly important role. Since these networks have no fixed infrastructure and are usually distributed over large areas, the use of routing protocols is indispensable. However, when the number of nodes within an area increases, the communication interferences and collisions increase significantly, thus reducing the network performance. In this paper, we first introduce a new measurable quantity, the "node concentration", in contrast to the standard network density. Then, the performance of the AODV (Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector) routing protocol is evaluated with respect to the variation in node concentration. Finally, we propose an enhancement of AODV, called CG-AODV, by introducing a "node concentration-driven gossiping" approach for limiting the flooding of control packets. The simulation results demonstrate that CG-AODV provides significant improvements in terms of packet delivery ratio and path discovery delay.

show abstract

“…The smaller the value of , the more accurate is the HLL prediction. We use the Fluid [8] mobility model in our simulation. In the Fluid model, both nodes maintain constant velocities throughout the link lifetime.…”

Section: -[Sec] and Alex-g Is Executed Until A Valid Hllmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In ad hoc sensor networks increasing mobility of nodes degrade the performance of developed protocols [1,2] [5], established paths frequently become invalid, communication flows interrupted and caused additional overheads. As aiming to dynamic location coordination prediction in participation with topology control of wireless sensor networks, we face to accurately predict the route in a peer to peer characteristic of sensor networks and define an algorithm to strongly adapt to a constantly changing topology with assumptions that transmission power, node position and velocity information are not available and constantly change in a timely manner [8] [10]. One special problem of Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) is frequent link breakages, those occur due to mobility and impairments of wireless sensor network transmission, as a link breaks when its two nodes move farther than each other's transmission range, therefore a path breaks when any of its composer links breaks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional route prediction algorithm based on minimal available information in wireless ad hoc sensor networks

Nejad

Shobeiri

2012

IET Conference on Wireless Sensor Systems (WSS 2012)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we propose a three dimensional algorithm for the optimum route prediction based on minimal available information, as we have no information from node position, velocity and velocity change also transmission power. The algorithm holds capabilities to finds a proactive route prediction in wireless sensor networks and predicts link lifetime capable to capturing the remaining time for which a link can be used for efficiently routing, therefore intended to be used for optimized route construction with consideration to predict longest living link lifetime between two nodes, without adaptation of specific mobility model. We present an adaptive route prediction algorithm that accurately predicts the longest living link between nodes in wireless sensor network, as algorithm gets input from a periodically sampled data that gathered in a noisy range of two nodes of a link.

show abstract

Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) routing protocols comparison for wireless sensor network

Cited by 29 publications

References 7 publications

A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks

A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks

Gossiping-Based AODV for Wireless Sensor Networks

Three-dimensional route prediction algorithm based on minimal available information in wireless ad hoc sensor networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About