2019
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)39162-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mo1895 – Efficacy of Intravenous Ustekinumab Re-Induction in Patients with Crohn’s Disease with a Loss of Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ustekinumab levels after re-induction were higher in patients who achieved remission, and there were no serious adverse effects related to re-induction. 16 A recent single-center experience describes 13 patients who received intravenous re-induction and remained on UST at the end of the study period (median follow-up 282 days). The authors describe that in a subset of patients who lose the response, re-induction with UST can be beneficial and even allows for regular maintenance dosing every 8 weeks to continue, 18 which is similar to what we found in a per-centage of our cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ustekinumab levels after re-induction were higher in patients who achieved remission, and there were no serious adverse effects related to re-induction. 16 A recent single-center experience describes 13 patients who received intravenous re-induction and remained on UST at the end of the study period (median follow-up 282 days). The authors describe that in a subset of patients who lose the response, re-induction with UST can be beneficial and even allows for regular maintenance dosing every 8 weeks to continue, 18 which is similar to what we found in a per-centage of our cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published data on the efficacy of IV re-induction with UST in patients with Crohn's disease who have lost the response obtained with this therapy are very scarce, and these series include a limited number of patients. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In a multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients responding to UST, one third of them (n = 35) lost response. Of these, IV re-induction was performed in 7 cases, and the treatment was effective in 4 (57.1%) patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently a multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed across five sites in Canada and Switzerland to evaluate the efficacy of an IV dose re-induction of UST (approximately 6 mg/kg) in 65 patients for either partial response or secondary LOR to UST, based on clinical, biochemical or endoscopic criteria. 88.3% were already optimized on q4w priori reinduction [ 40 ]. Clinical outcomes were analyzed at a median of 14 weeks (IQR: 12–19) post reinduction.…”
Section: Dose Escalation With Ustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravenous reloading in patients that are unresponsive to SC maintenance dosing has been described very scarcely in small case series only 3,4 . Indeed, this strategy may have significant merit, nevertheless it needs to be properly evaluated in prospective studies or a larger retrospective cohort that will incorporate pharmacokinetic parameters in addition to clinical, biochemical and endoscopic data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%