The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mNSC1 shows no evidence of protein-coding capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these protein coding probability data are consistent with previous studies that have suggested caution is warranted when extrapolating genome sequence analyses to infer TE-CDS exaptation events [ 13 , 16 , 35 , 36 ]. In particular, the notion that non-autonomous TEs that do not encode any protein, including SINEs such as the Alu family of elements, can emerge as protein coding sequences after being incorporated into exons has been directly challenged [ 13 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, these protein coding probability data are consistent with previous studies that have suggested caution is warranted when extrapolating genome sequence analyses to infer TE-CDS exaptation events [ 13 , 16 , 35 , 36 ]. In particular, the notion that non-autonomous TEs that do not encode any protein, including SINEs such as the Alu family of elements, can emerge as protein coding sequences after being incorporated into exons has been directly challenged [ 13 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…TE sequences that are spliced into mRNAs, actually encode protein sequences. However, this assumption has been challenged on several different fronts [ 13 , 16 , 35 , 36 ]. In particular, it is unclear whether non-autonomous TEs that do not encode any protein, such as Alu elements, actually provide protein coding sequences after becoming exonized [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the conservative approach of Pavlicek et al, a more recent publication from the Nekrutenko group refuted one of their own earlier discoveries of a mouse CDS that appeared to be derived almost entirely from SINEs [47]. Comparative sequence analysis with other Mus species, as well as the rat, did not find any evidence for the conservation of the ORF of this TE-derived gene.…”
Section: Genome Wide Analysesmentioning
confidence: 54%