2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/abcdb3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mn substitution effect on the local structure of La(Fe1−x Mn x )AsO studied by temperature dependent x-ray absorption measurements

Abstract: The local structure of La(Fe1−x Mn x )AsO has been investigated using temperature dependent Fe K-edge extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements. The EXAFS data reveal distinct behavior of Fe–As and Fe–Fe atomic displacements with a clear boundary between x ⩽ 0.02 and x > 0.02. The Fe–As bondlength shows a gradual thermal expansion while the Fe–Fe bond manifests a temperature dependent anomaly at ∼180 K for x > 0.02. It is intere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the σ i 2 ( T ) of the two bond lengths in CaKFe 4 As 4 together with the corresponding Einstein model fits. The Fe–As bond is well described by the Einstein model with the θ E = (314 ± 12) K, very similar to the case of the other pnictides. Similarly, temperature dependence of the σ i 2 for the Fe–Fe bond can be described by the Einstein model with θ E ∼ 228 ± 5 K, consistent with the earlier reports on the 122 system . The Einstein temperature of Fe–As bond ∼314 K (∼220 cm –1 ) should be associated with the infrared active Fe–As stretching mode (E u -symmetry) that has been observed ∼250 cm –1 in the optical studies of iron-based superconductors. ,, On the other hand, Fe–Fe Einstein temperature ∼228 K (∼158 cm –1 ) is possibly contributed by a hybrid Raman mode (A 1g + B 1g , the earlier is due to As axial motion while the latter is due to axial Fe vibrations).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure shows the σ i 2 ( T ) of the two bond lengths in CaKFe 4 As 4 together with the corresponding Einstein model fits. The Fe–As bond is well described by the Einstein model with the θ E = (314 ± 12) K, very similar to the case of the other pnictides. Similarly, temperature dependence of the σ i 2 for the Fe–Fe bond can be described by the Einstein model with θ E ∼ 228 ± 5 K, consistent with the earlier reports on the 122 system . The Einstein temperature of Fe–As bond ∼314 K (∼220 cm –1 ) should be associated with the infrared active Fe–As stretching mode (E u -symmetry) that has been observed ∼250 cm –1 in the optical studies of iron-based superconductors. ,, On the other hand, Fe–Fe Einstein temperature ∼228 K (∼158 cm –1 ) is possibly contributed by a hybrid Raman mode (A 1g + B 1g , the earlier is due to As axial motion while the latter is due to axial Fe vibrations).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The sample preparation and characterization by means of electrical resistivity, superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID) magnetometry, muon spin rotation (μSR), nuclear quadrupole, 75 As nuclear magnetic resonance, and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) are accurately described in Refs. [13][14][15]22,23]. In particular, μSR analysis evidenced that for samples with x = 0.0020, 0.0010, and 0.0075 a fully magnetic state with 100% of magnetic volume is gained just below the magnetic transition temperature, similarly to what observed in the La(Fe 1-x Ru x )AsO system [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These studies disclose an alternative view for the phenomenology of Fe-based superconductors, indicating that CDW and superconductive (SC) states are adjacent and competing in the phase diagrams. Local structural analyses of the same samples evidenced an emerging disorder in the structure as well as a sharp increase in the Fe moment even with a very small amount of Mn substitution [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%