2009
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2009.2024043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMSE-Based MDL Method for Robust Estimation of Number of Sources Without Eigendecomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between two adjacent sensors is d. As shown in Figure 1, the first sensor is regarded as the reference point for the array, assuming that there are K uncorrelated narrowband far-field signals impinging on this array from distinct directions θ 1 , … , θ K We also assume that the number of sources K is known a priori or has been estimated by the methods shown in [16,17]. Under such a scenario, the received signal vector x n ∈ ℂ…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between two adjacent sensors is d. As shown in Figure 1, the first sensor is regarded as the reference point for the array, assuming that there are K uncorrelated narrowband far-field signals impinging on this array from distinct directions θ 1 , … , θ K We also assume that the number of sources K is known a priori or has been estimated by the methods shown in [16,17]. Under such a scenario, the received signal vector x n ∈ ℂ…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The incoming signals are mutually independent, zero-mean and stationary processes; 2) The noise is zero-mean, additive white Gaussian, and statistically independent of all impinging sources; 3) In order to avoid the phase ambiguities, the inter-element spacing d should be within a quarter wavelength; 4) The number of sources K , K 1 and K 2 are known or accurately estimated [29][30][31], and the sensors number satisfies K < 2M + 1 and K 2 < M + 1.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The array measurements are modeled as where s(t) = [s 1 (t), · · · , s d (t)] T is the signal vector, n(t) = [n 1 (t), · · · , n M (t)] T contains the additive sensor noise, and A = [a(θ 1 , φ 1 ), · · · , a(θ d , φ d )] is the steering matrix, which consists of d array steering vectors a(θ i , φ i ), i = 1, · · · , d, with θ i and φ i representing the elevation and azimuth angles of the ith signal. Here, d is known to the receiver or estimated by an information theoretic criterion, such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) [20], minimum description length (MDL) [21], or their computationally efficient variants [22,23]. The array steering vector is given as…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the augmented measurement matrix x (nc) (t) as (23) to correspond with [17,18]. Substituting (1) and (9) into (23) yields…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%