The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMS observations of electron‐scale filamentary currents in the reconnection exhaust and near the X line

Abstract: We report Magnetospheric Multiscale observations of macroscopic and electron‐scale current layers in asymmetric reconnection. By intercomparing plasma, magnetic, and electric field data at multiple crossings of a reconnecting magnetopause on 22 October 2015, when the average interspacecraft separation was ~10 km, we demonstrate that the ion and electron moments are sufficiently accurate to provide reliable current density measurements at 30 ms cadence. These measurements, which resolve current layers narrower … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
110
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
12
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good agreement is found between two measures, both showing considerable structure and variability in the current density of the flux rope with a maximum value of ∼ 900 nA m −2 , while the current from plasma measurements is more structured, as shown by Phan et al (2016). Therefore, this current is transformed to the directions parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field (Fig.…”
Section: Observationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Good agreement is found between two measures, both showing considerable structure and variability in the current density of the flux rope with a maximum value of ∼ 900 nA m −2 , while the current from plasma measurements is more structured, as shown by Phan et al (2016). Therefore, this current is transformed to the directions parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field (Fig.…”
Section: Observationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…<Ω e > represents the direction of Ω e averaged over the interval including the times when Ω e peaks (the blue arrows in Figure 1a, P and Q). Instead of a simple average, which gives the result that is very sensitive to the period selection of averaging, we performed a minimum variance analysis (Paschmann & Daly, 1998) Red, green, cyan, blue, and magenta arrows present m vort n vort -plane projected electron velocity vectors at 2234:01.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 UT, respectively. They predominantly points to −m at all four-spacecraft locations.…”
Section: Origin Of the Enhanced Electron Vorticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, it is attributed to the current sheets with a plateau in B L during reconnection (e.g., Karimabadi et al, 2005;Phan et al, 2006). The ECSs are often associated with the electron diffusion region and the separatrices during magnetic reconnection (Baumjohann et al, 2007;Burch et al, 2016;Ji et al, 2008;Phan et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017). The ECSs are often associated with the electron diffusion region and the separatrices during magnetic reconnection (Baumjohann et al, 2007;Burch et al, 2016;Ji et al, 2008;Phan et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geophysical Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%