2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMN in the visual modality: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
184
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
23
184
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMN, however, exists even when attention is directed away from the deviant stimulus (Heslenfeld, 2003;Pazo-Alvarez et al, 2003). From this definition it follows that the observed response in the present experiment is not a MMN because when the task is changed to direct attention away from the shape the observed negativity to deviant targets disappears (Fig.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Event-related Potential (Erp) Studiesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The MMN, however, exists even when attention is directed away from the deviant stimulus (Heslenfeld, 2003;Pazo-Alvarez et al, 2003). From this definition it follows that the observed response in the present experiment is not a MMN because when the task is changed to direct attention away from the shape the observed negativity to deviant targets disappears (Fig.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Event-related Potential (Erp) Studiesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…MMN is resistant to manipulations of attention and states of wakefulness (Sculthorpe et al, 2009) even though these parameters can modulate its amplitude. An analog of MMN was described in visual (Tales et al, 1999;Pazo-Alvarez et al, 2003), olfactive (Krauel et al, 1999;Pause and Krauel, 2000), and somatosensory (Kekoni et al, 1997;Shinozaki et al, 1998) modalities, supporting a broad computational significance of MMN as a shared and automatic brain mechanism responsive to stimulus novelty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As noted by Friston et al (2005), the closely similar neuronal architecture of cortical layers throughout the cerebral cortex supports the view that a similar computational principle of predictive coding may apply to the multiple hierarchical levels of the cortical areas of the brain. Thus, our model may be used to account for higher-order instances of mismatch responses, such as the distinct MMNs evoked by a change in phoneme versus speaker (Giard et al, 1995;Dehaene-Lambertz, 1997), or the mismatch responses observed outside the auditory modality, either in visual (Tales et al, 1999;Pazo-Alvarez et al, 2003), olfactive (Krauel et al, 1999;Pause and Krauel, 2000), and somatosensory (Kekoni et al, 1997;Shinozaki et al, 1998) modalities or even in a crossmodal context (Arnal et al, 2011).…”
Section: Extensions and Limits Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature-specific elicitation of auditory MMN has been observed for various kinds of features such as frequency and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) (Levänen et al, 1993;Paavilainen et al, 2001), intensity and SOA (Paavilainen et al, 2001), frequency and duration (Levänen et al, 1993;Schröger, 1995, 2001), duration and intensity (Paavilainen et al, 2001;Schröger, 1995, 2001), frequency and location (Schröger, 1995), and location and the conjunction between frequency and intensity (Takegata et al, 1999) (but see also, e.g., Winkler et al, 1990). Although the counterpart of MMN in the visual modality has been discussed over the past few decades, it is still unclear whether a comparable MMN component exists in the visual modality (for review, see Pazo-Alvarez et al, 2003). In addition, visual MMN studies have not reported a feature-specific auditory MMN counterpart (Heslenfeld, 2003).…”
Section: Additivity Of Change Positivity For Dorsal and Ventral Stmentioning
confidence: 99%