2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.174114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T2 -limited sensing of static magnetic fields via fast rotation of quantum spins

Abstract: Diamond-based quantum magnetometers are more sensitive to oscillating (AC) magnetic fields than static (DC) fields because the crystal impurity-induced ensemble dephasing time T * 2 , the relevant sensing time for a DC field, is much shorter than the spin coherence time T2, which determines the sensitivity to AC fields. Here we demonstrate measurement of DC magnetic fields using a physically rotating ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centres at a precision ultimately limited by T2 rather than T * 2 . The rotation p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3 µs laser pulse is first applied, followed by microwave pulses synchronous with the rotation [33]. Although the NV orientation class we target is nearly parallel to the rotation axis, the small misalignment δθ between the NV axis and the z rotation axis means that static magnetic field components B ⊥ transverse to z are effectively up-converted to alternating fields at the motor rotation frequency, B ac ≈ B ⊥ δθ cos(ω rot t − φ 0 ) [46], with φ 0 an inconsequential phase set by the orientation of the diamond on the motor. Fluorescence detected from a spin-echo sequence with fixed total time τ will therefore exhibit fringes as the magnetic field tilt angle θ B is increased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3 µs laser pulse is first applied, followed by microwave pulses synchronous with the rotation [33]. Although the NV orientation class we target is nearly parallel to the rotation axis, the small misalignment δθ between the NV axis and the z rotation axis means that static magnetic field components B ⊥ transverse to z are effectively up-converted to alternating fields at the motor rotation frequency, B ac ≈ B ⊥ δθ cos(ω rot t − φ 0 ) [46], with φ 0 an inconsequential phase set by the orientation of the diamond on the motor. Fluorescence detected from a spin-echo sequence with fixed total time τ will therefore exhibit fringes as the magnetic field tilt angle θ B is increased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use spin-echo interferometry [46] synchronized to the rotation of the diamond [47] to measure the coherence of the rotating ensemble of NV centers. A 3 μs laser pulse is first applied, followed by microwave pulses synchronous with the rotation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure a normalized spin-echo signal by computing the difference between readout with a final π/2 and 3π/2 pulse in successive rotation periods. Although the NV orientation class we target is nearly parallel to the rotation axis, the small misalignment δθ between the NV axis and the z rotation axis means that static magnetic field components B ⊥ transverse to z are effectively up-converted to alternating fields at the motor rotation frequency, B ac ≈ B ⊥ δθ cos(ω rot t − φ 0 ) [47], with φ 0 an inconsequential phase set by the orientation of the diamond on the motor. Fluorescence detected from a spin-echo sequence with fixed total time τ will therefore exhibit fringes as the magnetic field tilt angle θ B is increased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work, we have demonstrated quantum control and measurement of single NV electron spins rotating at up to 200,000 rpm (3.33 kHz) [36,37]. Working with ensembles of NV centers reduces some of the complexity associated with optical measurement of a rotating diamond [1,38]. However, magnetic field alignment during rotation for optical polarization of nuclear spins imposes challenges comparable to that of measuring single NV centers, given the strict requirements for alignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%