2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.91.024916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ΛΛinteraction from relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Abstract: We investigate the two-particle intensity correlation function of in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We find that the behavior of the correlation function at small relative momenta is fairly sensitive to the interaction potential and collective flows. By comparing the results of different source functions and potentials, we explore the effect of intrinsic collective motions on the correlation function. We find that the recent STAR data give a strong constraint on the scattering length and effective range of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
124
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(105 reference statements)
5
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, ΛΛ correlation in high-energy heavy-ion collisions has been measured at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at the Brookhaven National Laboratory [30]. Theoretical analysis of data implies that the ΛΛ interaction is weakly attractive and there is no loosely bound state [31]. By comparison, another analysis suggests that ΛΛ interaction is weakly repulsive or there is a loosely bound state [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, ΛΛ correlation in high-energy heavy-ion collisions has been measured at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at the Brookhaven National Laboratory [30]. Theoretical analysis of data implies that the ΛΛ interaction is weakly attractive and there is no loosely bound state [31]. By comparison, another analysis suggests that ΛΛ interaction is weakly repulsive or there is a loosely bound state [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] and Ref. [31]. In the former, λ is regarded as a free parameter and the optimal value is found to be small, then the positive scattering length a 0 > 0 (decreasing phase shift) is favored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However they have different sign compared to the LL model. The sign difference of the scattering length between the LL fit and fits in [26] originates from the assumption on the λ parameter in the LL model and it was discussed by A. Ohnishi [31] in detail during the conference. When the λ parameter was treated as a free parameter in the LL model, the fit results in two minima and a fixed value of λ = 0.45 gives a negative scattering length with a minimal χ 2 /NDF.…”
Section: λ − λ Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical analysis of the final-state interaction effect using an s-wave scattering amplitude suggests the non-existence of a Λ − Λ resonance saturating the s-wave below the NΞ and ΣΣ thresholds. For more details please refer [21], where the shaded band represents the systematic error and the other filled points are fit to STAR data from K. Morita, T. Furumoto and A. Ohnishi [26]. Also, the Λ − Λ interaction parameters which reproduce the NAGARA event are shown as astrisk [27,28].…”
Section: λ − λ Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation