2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.104.044321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β -delayed neutron-emission and fission calculations within relativistic quasiparticle random-phase approximation and a statistical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the evaluated nuclear data, our results are consistent within a 3σ error band. Furthermore, in Figure 4, our preliminary results for the P 1n values are compared with evaluated nuclear data from the ENSDF and some theoretical predictions: RHB+pn-RQRPA (2016) [13], FRDM+QRPA (2018) [4], and the proton-neutron Relativistic Quasiparticle Random-Phase Approximation plus Hauser-Feshbach statistical model (pn-RQRPA + HFM, 2021) [15]. Regarding the comparison with theoretical models, our data supports the overall trend for all P 1n predictions.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Compared with the evaluated nuclear data, our results are consistent within a 3σ error band. Furthermore, in Figure 4, our preliminary results for the P 1n values are compared with evaluated nuclear data from the ENSDF and some theoretical predictions: RHB+pn-RQRPA (2016) [13], FRDM+QRPA (2018) [4], and the proton-neutron Relativistic Quasiparticle Random-Phase Approximation plus Hauser-Feshbach statistical model (pn-RQRPA + HFM, 2021) [15]. Regarding the comparison with theoretical models, our data supports the overall trend for all P 1n predictions.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Figure 4 shows the measured half-lives compared to recent literature data (Wu et al 2017) and to theoretical predictions of the FRDM2012+QRPA+HF, RHB+QRPA, and pnFAM models, respectively (Marketin et al 2016;Möller et al 2019;Ney et al 2020). Furthermore, Figure 5 shows the derived neutron-emission probabilities compared with theoretical predictions calculated using the FRDM2012+QRPA +HF, RHB+QRPA, and pn-RQRPA+HF models (Marketin et al 2016;Möller et al 2019;Minato et al 2021). Table 1 lists the resulting T 1/2 and P 1n values of all isotopes studied in the present work.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental P 1n values derived in this work. Lines show the theoretical values from three models (Marketin et al 2016;Möller et al 2019;Minato et al 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above discussions outline the major impact of uncertain nuclear physics inputs on the actinide production in merger ejecta. Further development in nuclear theory modeling, e.g., [79][80][81][82][83][84], will continue to improve our understanding in this aspect. In the next section, we will discuss how they can possibly leave imprints on kilonova emission of BNSMs.…”
Section: Theory Requirements and Nuclear Physics Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%